Can't this package just be removed, as 2.6.3 is now the latest stable
kernel and 2.4.25 the latest 2.4-series kernel?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I hereby suggest that the package named "g5" be removed from the Debian
archive. I previously considered adopting this orphaned package and
bringing it back from the dead, but now I wish to just let it rest in
peace. :)
The package depends on libgtk1.2 and the upstream sources have
disappeared. Ma
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 11:06, Ron Murray wrote:
> At Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:04:16 +,
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [1 ]
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:02:19AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, N
On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 05:08, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:00:21PM -0500, Alexander Winston wrote:
>
> > g5 (0.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
> > * Morphed into a native Debian package.
>
> Why?
From what I read, native Debian packages are not as
scription.
* Updated to the latest Debian policy version, 3.6.1.0.
* Morphed into a native Debian package.
* Adopted by Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
-- Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 02 Nov 2003
16:20:09 -0500
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 13:10, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2003-10-24 13:11 -0400, Alexander Winston wrote:
> > Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and
> > am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian
> > de
Hi, I came across http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html> yesterday and
am interested in helping in any way that I can, but I am not a Debian
developer and could not find any directions to follow in the
documentation related to fixing bugs in orphaned packages. If anyone
could point me to the relevant
7 matches
Mail list logo
