Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2002-08-13 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Please, could you mail people who are responsible ? I have not > been cced and [EMAIL PROTECTED] has not been either. > > I have fixed everything now. Sorry for the mistake. Sorry. > > I have disabled the BTS -> PTS link, until the above error is fix

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

2002-08-12 Thread Adam Heath
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Mail Delivery System wrote: > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its > recipients. The following address(es) failed: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > generated | /org/packages.qa.

Re: http://standard.debian.net/ now available

2001-09-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > The Packages file, see above. Note that Task: fields tend to appear *after* > the long description. Anything that uses dpkg code to generate PAckages files will do this. dpkg places user-defined fields after all others. Requests to make Tasks a known f

Bug#91629: Package saml still has at least one file in /usr/doc

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Heath
Package: saml Version: 970418-6, as in unstable on March 24 According to the Contents file for unstable, saml contains at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead. Please update you

Bug#91609: Package mserver still has at least one file in /usr/doc

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Heath
Package: mserver Version: 0.23a-1, as in unstable on March 24 According to the Contents file for unstable, mserver contains at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead. Please updat

Bug#91604: Package netenv still has at least one file in /usr/doc

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Heath
Package: netenv Version: 0.82-11, as in unstable on March 24 According to the Contents file for unstable, netenv contains at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead. Please update

Bug#91421: Package dotfile-doc still has at least one file in /usr/doc

2001-03-26 Thread Adam Heath
Package: dotfile-doc Version: 20010324-1, as in unstable on March 24 According to the Contents file for unstable, dotfile-doc contains at least one file in /usr/doc/. That directory is deprecated, and policy section 13.3 says that packages should place documentation in /usr/share/doc/ instead. P

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for November 26, 1999

1999-11-30 Thread Adam Heath
N GEEK CODE BLOCK Version: 3.12 GCS d- s: a-- c+++ UL++++ P+ L !E W+ M o+ K- W--- !O M- !V PS-- PE++ Y+ PGP++ t* 5++ X+ tv b+ D++ G e h*! !r z? -END GEEK CODE BLOCK- BEGIN PGP INFO Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Finger Print | KeyID 67 01 42 93 CA 37 FB 1E63 C9 80 1D 08 CF 84 0A | DE656B05 PGP AD46 C888 F587 F8A3 A6DA 3261 8A2C 7DC2 8BD4 A489 | 8BD4A489 GPG -END PGP INFO-

Bug#23575: ch1.html is truncated

1998-06-16 Thread Adam Heath
Package: developers-reference Version: 2.4.1.1 During IRC, a user said that wanted to know how to become a developer. I pointed them to the web site, and upon further investigation, found out that ch1.html was cut off. It is like this in the deb. 2.4.1.0(which I have on my system) doesn't have