On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 01:12:27PM +0900, yokota wrote:
> I'm maintaining Debian "calibre" package.
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/calibre
>
> Recently, I was upload new version package.
> This is major upgrade, and uses Qt6 and Qt6-WebEngine.
>
> Qt6-WebEngine drops mips64el and mipsel suppo
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
If the watch file fails to return any versions (usu. due to changes on
the remote server), the result is shown as "-", same as if there was
no watch file.
This is an error that should be at least pointed out to the maintainer;
the PTS (tracker.debian
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 01:09:43PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/04/21 at 12:33 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > I don't think there's a valid technical reason to not use a newer format.
&g
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:42:22AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As Mattia pointed out, the "3.0 (quilt)" format supports the
> "debian-single-patch" option (that you can put in debian/source/options)
> which makes it behave like source format 1.0 and auto-generates/updates a
> single patch in th
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Looking up if a given package is "key" (in Release Team sense) is currently
pretty tedious. Could you please mention this on packages' pages?
Meow!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (
Hi!
These are end-user questions, and this is a developer list (this one in
particular is about neglected packages and detecting neglect). It would
be nice if, in the future, you asked on debian-user@ or similar places.
Both of your questions are specific to a particular desktop environment
(Gnom
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 05:53:11PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> >>> IIRC with an access token the limit is 5000 queries per hour. Without a
> >>> token, much, much less.
> >>
> >> The UDD code calls uscan. Is there a way for uscan to use an access
> >> token?
> >
> > not for now, but I can add this fea
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/20 at 00:28 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > IIRC with an access token the limit is 5000 queries per hour. Without a
> > token, much, much less.
>
> The UDD code calls uscan. Is there a way for u
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:00:51PM +, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
> https://github.com/statsmodels/statsmodels/tags failed: 429 too many
> requests
>
> Which packages have this error seems to vary over time, but it seems to be
> common (~50-90% of Gi
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 03:10:56PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Package: tracker.debian.org
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/berkshelf
>
> still shows a version for berkshelf in unstable altough this package has been
> removed more then a month ago. Also the package database has no berkshelf
>
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
If you have a package with version "0" (a valid version number) -- like
"fonts-recommended" at the moment, DDPO won't show it. On the other hand,
a non-native package versioned "0-1" does show up.
This suggests a type confusion bug, like something equa
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Some places that list datetimes show explicit timezones (like the generation
timestamp at the bottom), some don't (eg. deferred-until). This is
confusing as a good majority of web pages these days use web browser's time
zone (obviously uncool with Tor
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
The buildd status on qa.debian.org shows individual architectures using
colors and symbols such as ⎇ ∉ ✔ ✘ ∿. Alas, these symbols are arranged
by arch name, without grouping into release and non-release archs. This
means, it is not obvious at a glanc
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 03:06:59PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 01:40:31PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Is there some convenient way how sponsors/mentors can remove obsolete
> > packages
> > from mentors?
>
> Not afaik.
>
> The mentors.d.n admins can do that though.
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Considering that debcheck hasn't seen any love in quite a while, what about
disabling it in DDPO's default view? Its warnings are bogus or
non-problems -- and false positive issues tend to make people ignore issues
that are actually worth fixing.
For
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
I'm afraid that the tool that displays changelogs from git breaks non-ASCII
characters. It's not a matter of web server configuration as http headers
are ok:
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Seen on https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/vcswatch?package=
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
The page at https://udd.debian.org/sponsorstats.cgi shows only some uploads.
Turns out an upload is shown only only if that version is still present on
at least one architecture in unstable. Currently, kfreebsd pins a good
fraction of packages, but gen
17 matches
Mail list logo
