Bug#452905: Reopen/Reassign: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)

2007-12-17 Thread A. Costa
reopen 452905 ! reassign 452905 bugs.debian.org thanks Is this right pseudo-package for this bug? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#452905: Re Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)

2007-12-16 Thread A. Costa
As per the closing 'bot message: You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly. But no "substantive response" in two closings. Perhaps the above disappointing boilerplate is a white lie, or j

Bug#452905: Reopen: Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.)

2007-12-15 Thread A. Costa
reopen 452905 ! thanks On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:27:13 + Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Namely, that BTS pages for bogus names can be accessed: > > > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=Microsoft%20Windows%20Vista;dist=unstable > > I don't see a bug here.

Bug#452905: qa.debian.org: "Debian Bug report logs" is lax about bogus package names.

2007-11-25 Thread A. Costa
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal This bug is similar, (perhaps it's the same), to this: qa.debian.org: "Debian Developer's Packages Overview" includes bug reporters. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=441283 Namely, that BTS pages for bogus names can be acce

Bug#441283: qa.debian.org: "Debian Developer's Packages Overview" includes bug reporters.

2007-09-08 Thread A. Costa
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Googling for my email address revealed: Debian Developer's Packages Overview Packages overview for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...the page says I'm a Debian Developer, which isn't so. (I report bugs and have at