Re: Lowering the barrier to entry/adoption and (mass) svn-to-git migration

On Friday, 27 January 2023 20:14:43 CET Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > Hi Diederik! Hi Jelmer! > I agree, I think anything that reduces the complexity of the ecosystem > is great and the lowers the barrier for entry. As pretty anything uses > Git now, I think migrating more things from SVN to Git would

Re: Lowering the barrier to entry/adoption and (mass) svn-to-git migration

Hi Diederik! I agree, I think anything that reduces the complexity of the ecosystem is great and the lowers the barrier for entry. As pretty anything uses Git now, I think migrating more things from SVN to Git would be great. On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 07:56:37PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > I w

Lowering the barrier to entry/adoption and (mass) svn-to-git migration

Hi! This is AFAIK my first interaction with debian-qa, so if I'm doing it incorrectly (like I should've filed a bug), please let me know. This mail will be quite long. I was looking at https://bugs.debian.org/770255 regarding "O: id3lib3.8.3" and I'll use that as an example, but I think it app

Bug#1029787: qa.debian.org: DDPO (and tracker.d.o): merely unreproducible package shows up as FTBFS in repro column

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de I’ve been seeing an FTBFS in the “Rep” column for a few days now for a package that is merely unreproducible but does build twice (dygraphs). The same bad info shows up on tracker.d.o if that helps.