Bug#1019380: UDD: import ports.d.o data to ports tables instead of derivatives tables

2022-12-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 15:25 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > 1/ looking into it, I noticed that the source for packages in unreleased > is not shipped. Is that expected? This is a long-standing issue with the ports mini-dak setup. The source packages are actually present in the archive but there a

Bug#1021007: UDD: archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty

2022-12-23 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, 2022-12-23 at 15:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Fixed (at least partially). Thanks. I've added support to madison.cgi and sent an rmadison patch: https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/commit/b259045e60b6f6f0f2f0b46d3c4f0d74afc3cf52 https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/

shutdown of lintian.debian.org?

2022-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
> > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way > > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect > > > would also be OK IMO. > > > > I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to > > the UDD implementation. That could b

Bug#1016188: marked as done (UDD/lintian: cannot filter only by lintian tag)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 16:23:01 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016188: UDD/lintian: cannot filter only by lintian tag has caused the Debian Bug report #1016188, regarding UDD/lintian: cannot filter only by lintian tag to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#1021007: UDD: archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty

2022-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 30/09/22 at 21:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: udd > X-Debbugs-CC: Thorsten Glaser > > The UDD archived_* tables for archive.d.o/debian-archive/ are empty > even though config is available for importin

Processed: retitle 899119 to fakeupstream.cgi: add redirector for osdn.net

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 899119 fakeupstream.cgi: add redirector for osdn.net Bug #899119 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Need redirector for osdn.net Changed Bug title to 'fakeupstream.cgi: add redirector for osdn.net' from 'qa.debian.org: Need redirector for osd

Bug#993500: Watch sould honor npm source

2022-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 23/12/22 at 14:34 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source > > On 02/09/21 at 09:13 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > > Package: qa.debian.org > > Severity: minor > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > Node-resolve watch fail with: > > uscan ha

Processed: triaging

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user qa.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to qa.debian@packages.debian.org (was lu...@debian.org). > usertags 844106 + pts There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: pts. > usertags 949009 + udd There were no usertags set. Usertag

Bug#963210: marked as done (carnivore: DDPO still using old name)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 15:00:53 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#963210: patch carnivore: DDPO still using old name has caused the Debian Bug report #963210, regarding carnivore: DDPO still using old name to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#993500: Watch sould honor npm source

2022-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source On 02/09/21 at 09:13 +, Bastien Roucariès wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: minor > > Dear Maintainer, > > Node-resolve watch fail with: > uscan had problems while searching for a new upstream version: > > unknown ct

Processed: Re: Bug#993500: Watch sould honor npm source

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source Bug #993500 [qa.debian.org] Watch sould honor npm source Changed Bug title to 'UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source' from 'Watch sould honor npm source'. -- 993500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#1026886: fakeupstream.cgi: support functionality to ignore pre-release on GitHub.com

2022-12-23 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
FYI: I've sent a merge request https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/merge_requests/43

Bug#1026886: fakeupstream.cgi: support functionality to ignore pre-release on GitHub.com

2022-12-23 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org # Problem Currently, it seems that there is no comprehensive way to ignore pre-release on GitHub.com [1] Adding a feature upstream=github_releases to avoid unexpected failure to do packaging pre-release as an official release

Bug#963526: marked as done (DDPO: Watch column is empty)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:33:52 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#963526: DDPO: Watch column is empty has caused the Debian Bug report #963526, regarding DDPO: Watch column is empty to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1025984: watch: add json output

2022-12-23 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:10:18AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 12/12/22 at 21:26 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Package: qa.debian.org > > Severity: wishlist > > > > It would be great if watch had a json mode, like vcswatch does. > > > > E.g. allowing the retrieval of > > https://qa.deb

Bug#1025984: marked as done (watch: add json output)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 10:24:42 + with message-id and subject line Implemented has caused the Debian Bug report #1025984, regarding watch: add json output to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#1025405: marked as done (UDD: how-can-i-help.json.gz - kbtin testing-autorm also lists colorized-logs binary but kbtin in testing has no colorized-logs binary)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:07:28 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1025405: UDD: how-can-i-help.json.gz - kbtin testing-autorm also lists colorized-logs binary but kbtin in testing has no colorized-logs binary has caused the Debian Bug report #1025405, regarding UDD: how

Bug#1024094: marked as done (sources.debian.org: 503 Service Unavailable)

2022-12-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 23 Dec 2022 11:11:36 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1024094: sources.debian.org: 503 Service Unavailable has caused the Debian Bug report #1024094, regarding sources.debian.org: 503 Service Unavailable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#1025984: watch: add json output

2022-12-23 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/12/22 at 21:26 +, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > It would be great if watch had a json mode, like vcswatch does. > > E.g. allowing the retrieval of > https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?package=foo&json=1 to get the watch > status for package