Bug#1008920: marked as done (Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 17:10:01 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1008920: Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release has caused the Debian Bug report #1008920, regarding Versions table not rebuilt after latest Buster 10.2 point release to be marke

Re: Revival of lintian.d.o (sort of)

Hello Lucas, On Sun, 03 Jul 2022, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Seeing that lintian got adopted, I got motivated into looking if I could > help on the lintian.d.o side, that is, provide up-to-date archive-wide > up to date to developers. Thanks for working on this! > Since the architecture of lintian.

Bug#1016034: marked as done (PTS: lintian statuses very out of date)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:29:03 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016034: PTS: lintian statuses very out of date has caused the Debian Bug report #1016034, regarding PTS: lintian statuses very out of date to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#1016075: marked as done (DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian?)

Your message dated Sat, 30 Jul 2022 14:18:50 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#1016059: DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian? has caused the Debian Bug report #1016075, regarding DDPO,Package Tracking System: move to UDD as a data source for lintian