Switch to declarative inetd config fragments (was Re: deprecate and move off using update-inetd?)

Hi! On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 12:43:56 -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > While working on a bug in a package that involved an update-inetd > rathole(#24043) I got to thinking about it. > Now that systemd provides a simple way to do socket activated services, I > think maybe we should stop automatically en

deprecate and move off using update-inetd?

Hi Debian-QA, While working on a bug in a package that involved an update-inetd rathole(#24043) I got to thinking about it. It's got some really old bugs and can't handle a bunch of cases we care about. There was the reconf-inetd effort https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep9/ but that

Bug#1016034: PTS: lintian statuses very out of date

Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal I'm looking at various packages on tracker.debian.org, and they say things like "lintian reports NN errors and NN warnings", but when opening the box, it says something along the lines of: "Created: 2021-10-13 Last update: 2021-11-05 04:23". It seems t

Bug#1016014: UDD: false positive(s) for sid-broken-symlinks

Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, My dashboard is showing "sid-broken-symlinks" against package duma. https://piuparts.debian.org/sid-broken-symlinks/source/d/duma.html None of the symlinks in duma are broken. ~> ls -l /usr/lib/libduma.so* lrwxrwx