Your message dated Sun, 9 Jan 2022 18:41:14 +0100
with message-id <20220109174114.m4oxksdmcvn4b4gc@begin>
and subject line Re: Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the
lintian version to use
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003340,
regarding qa.debian.org: Please agree with sal
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 8:51 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> But what is "latest version"?
The latest version is the most recent commit on the 'master' branch in
our public repository. [1] We found it is the fastest way to bring bug
fixes to the community.
Bug fixes can often be verified on ou
Felix Lechner, le dim. 09 janv. 2022 08:15:27 -0800, a ecrit:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 7:36 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > we cannot
> > write lintian overrides files that avoid red flags on both platforms.
>
> Lintian's latest version will always be authoritative.
But what is "latest version
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 7:36 AM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> we cannot
> write lintian overrides files that avoid red flags on both platforms.
Lintian's latest version will always be authoritative.
In addition, please note that the format for override files is changing. [1]
Please remember, h
Mattia Rizzolo, le dim. 09 janv. 2022 15:58:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:39:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > With lintian's current tendency of changing its output, we have to adapt
> > the suppression rules. But it appears that qa.debian.org and salsa's CI
> > rules are no
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:39:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> With lintian's current tendency of changing its output, we have to adapt
> the suppression rules. But it appears that qa.debian.org and salsa's CI
> rules are not using the same version of lintian, so we are stuck with
> either havi
6 matches
Mail list logo
