Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:54 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I think above perfectly explains why the original issue of the ticket > occurs, and it's by design. > So I add the "wontfix" tag to this ticket. The version in experimental is ESO, so I think it is fine to hide it by default, perhaps with

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
control: tags -1 +wontfix On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 2:38 PM Paul Wise wrote: > > It seems if a package from experimental has Built-Using on a package in > unstable, then dak pulls the unstable source package into experimental > and adds ESO: yes. I think above perfectly explains why the original i

Processed: Re: Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 +wontfix Bug #932431 [qa.debian.org] DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 932431: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932431 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 14:27 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > I think this can explain why an old version of package is still in > archive, but still cannot explain why it appears in *experimental* > column in DDPO page. This simply because DDPO just reflects what is in the archive, if you grep the P

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:08 AM Paul Wise wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote: > > > So what's ESO? > > A package which has this in the Packages file: > > Extra-Source-Only: yes > > dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around > for license compl

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Shimizu wrote: > So what's ESO? A package which has this in the Packages file: Extra-Source-Only: yes dak uses this to indicate that the source package is only kept around for license compliance purposes because another package still has a Built-Using heade

Bug#932431: DDPO: package removed from experimental but still shown in DDPO column

2020-09-26 Thread Roger Shimizu
Dear Mattia, I also met this issue on a few packages I uploaded [2]: - golang-golang-x-xerrors - golang-github-google-go-github - golang-go.crypto [2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=rosh >> I have noticed that the package 'golang-github-jinzhu-inflection' is >> still listed in the exp