Quoting Paul Wise (2019-01-19 04:38:04)
> > At
> >
> > https://qa.debian.org/debcheck.php?dist=unstable&package=fonts-sawarabi-mincho,
> > it show as below but debhelper-compat (= 12) is satisfied in sid
> > > BuildDepends
> > >
> > > Package declares a build time dependency on debhelper-compat
On 2019-01-14 19:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/01/19 at 08:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary
>> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may
>> silently FTBFS for a long time.
>> Does anyone have an ide
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 03:06:59PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 01:40:31PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Is there some convenient way how sponsors/mentors can remove obsolete
> > packages
> > from mentors?
>
> Not afaik.
>
> The mentors.d.n admins can do that though.
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 01:44:21PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Can a red flag be added on mentors for packages not yet in Debian without ITP?
I think there is already a lintian tag signaling this, however if you
think that mentors should *also* check for this, please open an issue at
https://sals
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 01:40:31PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Is there some convenient way how sponsors/mentors can remove obsolete packages
> from mentors?
Not afaik.
The mentors.d.n admins can do that though. I'm forwarding this mail to
support@m.d.n so they can have a look :)
> ___
Hello QA,
Can a red flag be added on mentors for packages not yet in Debian without ITP?
Cheers,
Bart
Hello, [addressed to the uploaders at mentors]
I see packages at mentors not yet in Debian and without ITP. One or more have
your name. Intentional? There should be a
Hello QA,
Is there some convenient way how sponsors/mentors can remove obsolete packages
from mentors?
Cheers,
Bart
__
Hello,
Some packages at mentors are older or equal to unstable. Could you remove the
packages from mentors unless some good reason not to?
ulfius 2.5.2-4
7 matches
Mail list logo