Re: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 09 Mar 2016, Osamu Aoki wrote: > In retrospective for backport, string should have been kept if possible. Not only for backports, but for backwards compatibility in general... I don't think that the string changes are justified in the --dehs output. > In old code, error reporting had

More sensible status field in upstream table? (Was: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream)

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:06:13PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > It's still quite wrong to have to compare textual strings. You should have > some booleans or keywords exported in the --dehs output so that we can > easily query the status without fearing further changes in the text... +1 Eve

Re: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Osamu, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:24:09PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > ... > > > It changed when a backport of devscripts >= 2.15.10 was installed on the > > > QA systems. > > > > Thanks for the very helpful explanation. So if I w

Re: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Excuse me. On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:38:46PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: ... > > It changed when a backport of devscripts >= 2.15.10 was installed on the > > QA systems. > > Thanks for the very helpful explanation. So if I would like to restore > the old behavior I would need to discuss th

Re: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi James, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 06:45:32AM -0500, James McCoy wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:28:10AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > udd=> select status, count(*) from upstream group by status ; > > status| count > > --+--- > >

Re: [UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread James McCoy
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:28:10AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > when I query for the possible values of status I get: > > udd=> select status, count(*) from upstream group by status ; > status| count > --+--- >

[UDD] unexpected changes of values in table upstream

2016-03-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, when I query for the possible values of status I get: udd=> select status, count(*) from upstream group by status ; status| count --+--- | 4420 newer package available | 4409 up to date