Your message dated Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:33:24 +0800
with message-id <1456029204.3531.109.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#814204: UDD: upstream.rb cannot handle version=4
d/watch files
has caused the Debian Bug report #814204,
regarding UDD: upstream.rb cannot handle version=4 d/watch fil
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:16:00AM -0500, James McCoy wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2016 1:24 AM, "Stuart Prescott" wrote:
> > Upgrading devscripts on ullmann.d.o to a new backported version of
> > devscripts
> > will solve this; the backport does not currently exist in jessie-backports.
>
> I've been hold
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: minor
Hi there,
in the "general" section there are links to the DDPO pages of the
package's maintainer resp. uploaders. However, these links point to the
respective DDPO pages with the "email" keyword. This means, that the
linked page will only show packages
Le Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 10:33:46AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro a écrit :
>
> Also, using an icons font means a single HTTP request to download all
> icons at once, what greatly reduces the latency on loading pages.
Hi Antonio,
isn't the browser's cache solving very efficiently this problem after the
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:09:31 +1100 Stuart Prescott wrote:
> I'd rather not see us loading images in instead of using scalable fonts; the
> visual result will be much poorer (either fuzzy oversized raster image, not
> scalable right sized raster image or memory hogging browser crashing svg).
Is
5 matches
Mail list logo