Your message dated Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:52:54 +0100
with message-id <20151218215254.gd26...@home.ouaza.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#808281: tracker.debian.org: UpdateRepositoriesTask
error
has caused the Debian Bug report #808281,
regarding tracker.debian.org: UpdateRepositoriesTask error
to be ma
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Christophe Siraut wrote:
> Keywords management is currently done using extensive javascript and
> ajax requests. As the rest of the application is using Django, we could
> gain reliability and simplicity using Django forms. We should not
> require javascript IMHO, better u
On 18/12/15 at 21:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
> usertag 767024 - udd
> usertag 767024 + dehs
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > udd-dehs seems to use mole.watch, according to the code.
>
> Duh, what a stupid name for the cgi t
user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 767024 - udd
usertag 767024 + dehs
thanks
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> udd-dehs seems to use mole.watch, according to the code.
Duh, what a stupid name for the cgi then :)
> I would recommend switching to udd's upstream table, given
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse
display clarity"):
> [advice]
Thanks for your suggestions which look very helpful. I will try to
look at this at the weekend.
Ian.
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > That said I'm not opposed to try to do something more dense but the layout
> > is handled via bootstrap and reducing the spacing in a consistent manner
> > probably requires to rebuild bootstrap with different settings in terms
> > of spacing.
>
> I have
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse
display clarity"):
> I would certainly welcome feedback once we have alternatives to show off.
If you'd welcom contributions, I can certainly try to help this way.
> That said I'm not opposed to try to do something more d
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse
> display clarity"):
> > However the spacing is unlikely to evolve significantly... many people
> > enjoy its "lighter" aspect too.
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'm sorry to argue,
Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#778240: tracker.debian.org has much worse
display clarity"):
> However the spacing is unlikely to evolve significantly... many people
> enjoy its "lighter" aspect too.
Thanks for your reply. I'm sorry to argue, but:
I don't know which these "many people" are. T
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear contributors,
Keywords management is currently done using extensive javascript and
ajax requests. As the rest of the application is using Django, we could
gain reliability and simplicity using Django forms. We should not
require javascript IMHO,
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Trying to build a Tracker database from scratch, using the repositories fixture
as descibed in the documentation, I get the following:
2015-12-18 08:54:11,265 INFO: Starting task UpdateRepositoriesTask
2015
Hi,
UDD has the correct info, as you can check with:
select * from upstream where source ='mini-buildd';
udd-dehs seems to use mole.watch, according to the code.
I would recommend switching to udd's upstream table, given it's also
used for DMD. So problems would be easier to notice.
Lucas
On
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Bug #767024 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: Reports wrong new upstream
for a native package
Bug reassigned from package 'tracker.debian.org' to 'qa.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #767024 to the same va
Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 udd-dehs: Report wrong new upstream version for a native
package
Control: user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 + udd
Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org
Hello Lucas,
is there any chance that you can fix the problem b
14 matches
Mail list logo
