Hi!
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 15:47:31 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> said on #debian-reproducible:
>
>h01ger, helmut: here is an example of a package embedding test reports:
> https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/posixtestsuite.html
> it currently already varies. with nocheck
On 05/24/2015 03:40 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> /tmp/buildd/fftw-2.1.5/missing: line 81: makeinfo: command not found
> WARNING: 'makeinfo' is missing on your system.
>[...]
> Makefile:370: recipe for target 'fftw.info' failed
> make[2]: *** [fftw.info] Error 127
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/tm
said on #debian-reproducible:
h01ger, helmut: here is an example of a package embedding test reports:
https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/posixtestsuite.html
it currently already varies. with nocheck it would probably vary even more (or
the file would not be there). jfyi.
source: inn2,qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 jenkins
Hi Marco,
While working on the “reproducible bu
source: rcs,fftw,qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: user qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 jenkins
Hi,
While working on the “reproducible buil
Hi,
On Sonntag, 24. Mai 2015, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > The check does not impose anything on package maintainers, like
> > migration blocking or similar. So even if there was a substantial
> > amount of packages that would fail that test, it would still be useful
> > information for the reproduc
6 matches
Mail list logo
