Hi Guillem,
> > > I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> > > should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> > > succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> > > should be no different when enabled.
> >
> > Polic
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 11:42:31AM +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Policy is, however, silent on whether that is the correct behaviour or not.
> Clarifying policy as to what the correct behaviour should be seems to be a
> necessary first step. I would expect that policy would end up saying
> som
Hi!
On Sun, 2015-05-24 at 11:42:31 +1000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> > should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> > succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> > should
Hi Helmut,
> I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
> should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
> succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without nocheck, it
> should be no different when enabled.
Policy is, however, silent on
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: jenkins
I'd expect that setting DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck on a package build
should not change the resulting binary packages. It might make the build
succeed despite being broken, but if it succeeds without
Hi
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I noticed that the ftpnew gatherer for UDD is currently broken.
> (...)
> Location: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/ [following]
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden
There is a related issue with deferred packages: Link "non-NEW uploads
are available
6 matches
Mail list logo
