On 03/22/2015 08:45 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Chris,
Hi Holger. :)
> On Samstag, 21. März 2015, Chris Knadle wrote:
>> understandable, and an extent to which it's a bit frightening because
>> it means I can't know what I'll be notified concerning changes to my
>> own config files and therefo
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:01:30PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> I didn't read much of this thread at it occurred; am catching up now.
>
> It is absolutely and unquestionably essential that no file in /etc which
> has *any* local modifications ever be edited on package upgrade w/o the
> admin's cons
I didn't read much of this thread at it occurred; am catching up now.
It is absolutely and unquestionably essential that no file in /etc which
has *any* local modifications ever be edited on package upgrade w/o the
admin's consent.
Adding users and groups on install is one thing, editing a locall
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Dear Maintainer,
I found some [errors][1] on sponsorstats web page.
I join the patch to fix that.
Cheers,
Laurent
[1]: https://validator.nu/?doc=https%3A%2F%2Fudd.debian.org%2Fsponsorstats.c
Hi Chris,
On Samstag, 21. März 2015, Chris Knadle wrote:
> understandable, and an extent to which it's a bit frightening because
> it means I can't know what I'll be notified concerning changes to my
> own config files and therefore how my system runs.
thankfully "apt-get install etckeeper" can h
5 matches
Mail list logo
