Re: Adoption of slides

2015-02-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Riley Baird wrote: > Okay, thanks. I had assumed that there was some form of special process > for orphaned packages. Nothing special for the sponsorship side of things no. Rest of the adopting stuff is documented here: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developer

Re: Adoption of slides

2015-02-03 Thread Riley Baird
On 04/02/15 12:06, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Riley Baird wrote: > >> I'm interested in adopting the "slides" package. However, since I'm not >> a DD, I can't upload the packages myself. If I adopt it, will someone be >> willing to sponsor my uploads? > > You'll need to se

Re: Adoption of slides

2015-02-03 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Riley Baird wrote: > I'm interested in adopting the "slides" package. However, since I'm not > a DD, I can't upload the packages myself. If I adopt it, will someone be > willing to sponsor my uploads? You'll need to search for a sponsor in the usual way: http://me

Adoption of slides

2015-02-03 Thread Riley Baird
Hi debian-qa! I'm interested in adopting the "slides" package. However, since I'm not a DD, I can't upload the packages myself. If I adopt it, will someone be willing to sponsor my uploads? Yours thankfully, Riley Baird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subj

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 19:55, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> Hi Daniel,

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 19:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Dani

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/02/15 at 18:33 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > On 30/01/1

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 09:37, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> If my

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 03/02/15 at 09:22 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> > >> On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ah

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 09:31, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> Is there a DSA contact who looks after ullmann.d.o? > filing DSA tickets is the way to go... > >> Or do you have sudo >> access? I notice nobody replied to the DSA ticket to apt-get inst

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Daniel, On Dienstag, 3. Februar 2015, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Is there a DSA contact who looks after ullmann.d.o? filing DSA tickets is the way to go... > Or do you have sudo > access? I notice nobody replied to the DSA ticket to apt-get install vpim. when did you file this ticket? cheers

Bug#775180: analysis

2015-02-03 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 03/02/15 08:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 31/01/15 at 11:09 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> On 30/01/15 16:20, Christophe Siraut wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> If my proposed solution seems reasonable I'll go ahead and code it (...) >>> It seems perfectly reasonable to me