Bug#759486: marked as done (creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:49:54 +0200 with message-id <20140905154954.gf3...@x230-buxy.home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#759486: creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined has caused the Debian Bug report #759486, regarding creates invalid browse link when no

Bug#759486: creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined

Control: tag -1 + patch On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:42:46 +0200 "Thijs Kinkhorst" wrote: > When a package has a Vcs-something field but not a Vcs-Browser field, the > tracker does display a browse link but with an empty href: Please find attached a possible patch. -- Sophie Brun >From 2cb138161b0

Processed: Re: creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #759486 [tracker.debian.org] creates invalid browse link when no vcs-browser field defined Added tag(s) patch. -- 759486: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759486 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

Hi Charles, On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:41:13PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > If the final result is extra work and confusion, how about adding a comment > that this field should be avoided for the moment ? Sounds reasonable (same for Watch field). > In any case, the Homepage field of debian