On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Gabriele Giacone <1o5g4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> you can find a patch to make g-i-installation jobs faster by switching
> from disk image files to logical volumes on "experimenting" branch.
Update: branches are
- "lvm", already proposed changes + PV/VG creation in i
Your message dated Sat, 26 Jul 2014 17:02:50 +0200
with message-id <20140726150250.GA5771@atitude.localdomain>
and subject line Re: Bug#753676: tracker.debian.org: Review the trello board
and file relevant entries in the BTS
has caused the Debian Bug report #753676,
regarding tracker.debian.org: R
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: wishlist
Running pyling gives back lots of output. It would be nice to fix some
of the real errors reported, maybe take into account some of
refactorization suggestions and add some ignore tags to hide false-
positives errors (maybe provide
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: minor
This happened when we were using the fixture
distro_tracker/core/fixtures/debian-repositories.xml with all
repositories enabled as binary repositories. The total number of APT
cache files was around 700 and I suspect that some files a
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: wishlist
While distro-tracker handles well file:/ URI for repositories, the
admin interface doesn't allow to input such URIs. It would be nice if
we could fix this. (Ticket migrated from Trello:
https://trello.com/c/duNhR7pO/)
--
To UNSU
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #756028 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: REST interface for packages
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'minor'
--
756028: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Original author also suggested REST authentification and REST rate
limiting.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2014072613262
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: normal
Performances would be much better if we had some well-chosen
indexes… at least on package names and other field that we use for
queries and joins. Note that Django automatically creates indexes for
a number of fields (those with uni
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The "binary package" box should also list obsolete binary packages
which only exist in non-default repositories. It should also list
architecture specific packages. The obsolete binaries should be
listed after th
Package: tracker.debian.org
Version: 0.20140710
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
Please merge patch-tracker.debian.org and watch file scanner (Ticket migrated
from Trello: https://trello.com/c/duNhR7pO/)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/07/14 at 14:01 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> > On 26/07/14 at 13:19 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> >> Did you know about the existence of
>> >> https://qa.debian.org/~bartm/
On 26/07/14 at 14:01 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 26/07/14 at 13:19 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >> Did you know about the existence of
> >> https://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt ?
> >
> > Oops, no.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 26/07/14 at 13:19 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> Did you know about the existence of
>> https://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt ?
>
> Oops, no. (or I had forgotten about it)
>
> I did search for similar scr
On 26/07/14 at 13:19 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2014 11:37 AM, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wrote a simple UDD CGI that does various sanity checks on WNPP
> > bugs: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/wnpp-checks.cgi
> >
> > It checks things such as:
> > - RFP/ITP fo
On Jul 26, 2014 11:37 AM, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just wrote a simple UDD CGI that does various sanity checks on WNPP
> bugs: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/wnpp-checks.cgi
>
> It checks things such as:
> - RFP/ITP for packaged software
> - ITA/RFA/RFH/O for packages not in Debian
> -
On 26/07/14 at 12:52 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 26 iul 14, 11:35:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just wrote a simple UDD CGI that does various sanity checks on WNPP
> > bugs: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/wnpp-checks.cgi
> ...
> > As you can see, there's still a few things
On Sb, 26 iul 14, 11:35:55, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wrote a simple UDD CGI that does various sanity checks on WNPP
> bugs: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/wnpp-checks.cgi
...
> As you can see, there's still a few things to fix. It would be great if
> a few people could monitor this p
Hi,
I just wrote a simple UDD CGI that does various sanity checks on WNPP
bugs: http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/wnpp-checks.cgi
It checks things such as:
- RFP/ITP for packaged software
- ITA/RFA/RFH/O for packages not in Debian
- Packages with more than one WNPP bug
- WNPP bugs not following defin
Hi Holger and everybody else,
writing you and including debian-qa as discussed on #debian-qa :)
Quoting Holger Levsen (2014-07-08 00:59:05)
> On Montag, 7. Juli 2014, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > I did not plan to run this script more often yet. I'll probably do another
> > run after having added
19 matches
Mail list logo
