On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:50 AM, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> Okay... It took a bit of thinking of how to work it, but I've come up
> with a working solution that caches the file list for each project
> requested.
There was some discussion on IRC about the problem and a caching proxy
was suggested ins
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 752384 + patch
Bug #752384 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: sourceforge.net redirector doesn't
detect new upstream versions
Added tag(s) patch.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
752384: http://bugs
Control: -1 + patch
On 21/07/14 14:58, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 15:39 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>
>> Are we really consuming so much bandwidth for that feature? I assume
>> this will happen each time a user or a daemon wants to check a
>> particular package. I'm not convinced
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 15:39 +0200, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Are we really consuming so much bandwidth for that feature? I assume
> this will happen each time a user or a daemon wants to check a
> particular package. I'm not convinced this is worth especially they ask
> for a cache of 1 hour, do w
Hi All,
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 11:02 +0100, Daniel Lintott wrote:
> On 21/07/14 04:11, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Unfortunately the final word on that is that Debian needs to replace
> > our current redirector with one based on the RSS feature and also to
I honestly was expecting such answer!
> > add a
Hi Daniel,
many thanks for your work on this!
> It should definitely be possible to add a caching mechanism to the the
> new redirector, currently I have a couple of ideas on this but both have
> drawbacks.
>
> 1. Use a Berkeley DB to store the retrieved data, similar to what is
> currently done
On 21/07/14 04:11, Paul Wise wrote:
> Unfortunately the final word on that is that Debian needs to replace
> our current redirector with one based on the RSS feature and also to
> add a cache mechanism (they suggested a 1 hour cache time) so that we
> don't overload the RSS feature.
>
> Do you thi
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
> In its initial development phase, we ensured that the codebase would work
> well with Python 3. Unfortunately nobody cared since then and now we have
> a lot of failing tests when we run it with Python 3.
To make it easier to test in the various combin
8 matches
Mail list logo
