Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
I have tried to setup a local instance to contribute some patches but
the initial import of the database needs more than 14GB of RAM. This
makes contributing quite complicated. Trying to limit to uns
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Such errors are caused by duplicate WNPP bugs. I think that it makes
> sense to fix them in the BTS, rather than work around them in UDD.
3 days ago I reply to one of that bugs causing this error:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
On 16/07/14 at 18:52 +0200, Christophe Siraut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > thanks to Paul one issue was fixed. Now we are running into the next
> > one. Anybody with some spare time to care for this?
>
> The following patch might help, it follows a stackoverflow
---
docs/setup/setup.rst | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/docs/setup/setup.rst b/docs/setup/setup.rst
index 9221289b6cce..810c80dc6085 100644
--- a/docs/setup/setup.rst
+++ b/docs/setup/setup.rst
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Distro Tracker currently depends on the following Debian
package
Hi,
Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> thanks to Paul one issue was fixed. Now we are running into the next
> one. Anybody with some spare time to care for this?
The following patch might help, it follows a stackoverflow
recommendation [1], we want to commit or rollback after each insert.
No
Hi folks,
thanks to Paul one issue was fixed. Now we are running into the next
one. Anybody with some spare time to care for this?
Thanks for your attention
Andreas.
- Forwarded message from Cron Daemon -
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:12:18 +
From: Cron Daemon
To: lu...@debian
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:29:01PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I wasn't aware that collab-qa was writeable for all. Fixes pushed. The
> issue looks like it was in two regexes (one in blends, one in orphaned
> packages) in the Python code rather than the Ruby code. Also I got
> tracebacks fr
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Yeah, but it really duplicates @packages.debian.org which is already
> forwarded to the PTS. And direct mails to @packages.qa.debian.org
> are refused except if they have a magical header X-PTS-Approved which is a
> rather unfriendly.
For
Hi,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:43 AM, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
>
> > I submit this to share my plan and to invite interested contributors to
> > review this idea and possibly share their feedback.
>
> The design looks good. The only concern I would have is th
9 matches
Mail list logo
