Hi Asheesh,
Asheesh Laroia writes:
> Hi Michael! I'm curious how the popcon data backup would be useful, since
> fundamentally official UDD and my UDD are based on the same data set --
> mine is just an import of the main UDD snapshot.
If official UDD is down, I can fall back to yours.
I downl
Holger Levsen writes:
> I think we perhaps need to accept that all automated checks are
> going to occasionally going to offer up false positives and we accept that
> they are right 90% of the time and just learn to ignore them the other 10% of
> the time.
Or provide a way for the package ma
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 12/07/13 at 08:25 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Asheesh,
Asheesh Laroia writes:
* Is this useful to you? If so, please make me feel good by saying so. (-;
I think this is a great idea, thanks for working on it.
To make it useful for me, I
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 02:53:00 Bart Martens wrote:
> Do you have examples ?
No, not at this moment...
Do you think I'm describing improbable situation?
Even if watch files are constantly monitored still there is
possibility for existence of two redundant watch files isn't it?
Perhaps maintainers ca
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:42:44AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:54:30 Boris Pek wrote:
> > As Dmitry mentioned, in some cases disagreement with maintainer is
> > possible, but such situations should be rare I think.
>
> IMHO the likely case for removal is aging of "updated
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:54:30 Boris Pek wrote:
> As Dmitry mentioned, in some cases disagreement with maintainer is
> possible, but such situations should be rare I think.
IMHO the likely case for removal is aging of "updated debian/watch"
file(s). In many cases "debian/watch" files are maintained
Hi Bart,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 23:32:53 Bart Martens wrote:
> You asked me to be more specific :
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 04:53:40PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > Why? Still not convinced? Even hypothetical example should be enough
> > as long as argument make sense. IMHO at this point you sh
h01ger: should it be changed to 'please move version X from
experimental to unstable'?
I've always considered it a reminder to do that
* h01ger would prefer it to be quiet
that version is perfectly fine in experimental
* h01ger dislikes automatic todo entries where one cannot or doesnt want to
Re: To mirr...@debian.org 2013-07-11 <20130711082855.gb15...@msgid.credativ.de>
> quantz (qa.debian.org) is being pushed from stabile so it knows when
> the NFS mirror there has been updated. The last time this worked was
> on July 5th:
>
> Fri Jul 5 06:14:58 UTC 2013 sync:archive: sync:all
> S
Hi Asheesh,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 05:35:12PM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2013, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
>
> >Hey all,
> >
> >I started running a public UDD mirror here:
> >http://public-udd-mirror.xvm.mit.edu/
> >
> >I'll move it to be on .debian.net as the canonical URL in the ne
Hi.
FYI, I've just committed to the QA SVN a few changes to the scripts
generating the RDF of the PTS, so that the full dump is no longer a huge
Turtle RDF document, but is now a .tar.bz2 archive which contains
sub-documents (still Turtle) for every "hash" of the package names (a,
b, liba, libb, e
11 matches
Mail list logo
