Andrei POPESCU writes:
>> I also see no reason to significantly increase the traffic on -qa@. :)
>
> Would you know how many mails that is?
It's about 5-6 misfiled bugs a week on average, but there are times when
it jumps to tens of it within a day, then there are quiet times with no
such report
Hi,
When you have done all three steps successfully, I will send you an
archive with the Debian QA EC2 account key. Using it, you can reserve
and terminate instances.
We use "spot instances" (instances at a lower price that can be
terminated by Amazon if the "market price" becomes higher than the
On 16/05/13 at 23:02 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 16 mai 13, 20:24:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage
> > > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1
Jut for the statistics:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/05/13 at 10:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > I somehow have the impression, that the number of missing descriptions
> > is silently growing. It seems that the problem only concerns
On 16/05/13 at 22:30 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > I admit I'm a bit astonished that wheezy and jessie are fixed as well
> > > after enforcing rereading the english translations for sid. I'll rerun
> > > this coun
Hi there,
I just want to say that the installation process for ATIProprietary on the
Debian Wiki (installation steps for Squeeze) works perfectly on the new
Debian 7.0 Wheezy. (only needed to change the linux-headers part for the
actual kernel).
Works like a charm.
Thanks
--
*
**Patrick Laurin
Hi Lucas,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:57:44PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I admit I'm a bit astonished that wheezy and jessie are fixed as well
> > after enforcing rereading the english translations for sid. I'll rerun
> > this counting of missing descriptions the next couple of days to see
>
Hi Andrei,
Le jeudi, 16 mai 2013 17.40:39, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
> I'm working on triaging some bugs without a package[1] and there are a
> lot of bugs originally filed against cupsys or some related package.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=
Thanks for noticing them
I used it :)
El 16/05/2013 20:16, "Lucas Nussbaum" escribió:
> On 12/05/13 at 11:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > In order to make your life slightly easier (and to reduce a bit the
> risks in
> > case of mistakes :) ), I've already reserved 5 "medium" instances for
> you. So
> > you don't nee
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 20:24:41, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage
> > from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1]
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?ma
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 19:33:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
> >
> > The package is still in oldstable
>
> Nope.
That would explain why rmadison also came up empty, but why does the PTS
claim the packag
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 16:34 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
>
> The package is still in oldstable
Nope.
adsb@franck:~$ dak ls timeout
adsb@franck:~$
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
On 16/05/13 at 19:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage
> from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1]
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=
>
> I couldn't help noticing there are quite a few new bug
On 12/05/13 at 11:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> In order to make your life slightly easier (and to reduce a bit the risks in
> case of mistakes :) ), I've already reserved 5 "medium" instances for you. So
> you don't need to do the resources reservation steps of README. The list of
> those node
On 16/05/13 at 10:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I somehow have the impression, that the number of missing descriptions
> is silently growing. It seems that the problem only concerns the English
> long descriptions. To verify this thesis I did
>
> udd=> SELECT release, language,
Hello,
As you might have noticed today I made myself busy doing some bug triage
from the 'unknown-package' bug list[1]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=
I couldn't help noticing there are quite a few new bugs filed against
wrong/inexistent packages and should probably be
On 15/05/13 at 15:33 -0500, Nathan Handler wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > You mission this time:
> > - pick up ~100 random packages from the list of packages that failed to
> > build on
> > 2013-05-09 and are still marked TODO. it's a good idea to ignore th
Hello,
I'm working on triaging some bugs without a package[1] and there are a
lot of bugs originally filed against cupsys or some related package.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?maint=
They were probably "left behind" when cupsys was renamed to cups. Since
it's quite a lot of
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 17:54:57, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 16 mai 13, 16:34:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > >
> > > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
> >
> > packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
>
> Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use
> the
On Jo, 16 mai 13, 16:34:35, Holger Levsen wrote:
> >
> > [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
>
> packages.qa.debian.org/timeout helps :-)
Oh, I thought 'oldstable' was reactivated on p.d.o. Ok, I'll just use
the PTS next time.
> The package is still in oldstable, bugs will be
On 2013-05-16 14:42 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these:
>
> $ querybts --buglist timeout
> Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout...
> #585745 Please drop timeout binary package
> #531787 timeout move to coreutils?
These ca
Hi Andrei,
On Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2013, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> As far as I can tell the package is not in Debian anymore[1] so I
> propose closing these bugs. If there is no disagreement I will do so in
> a few days.
>
> [1] packages.debian.org only shows a hit in debports
packages.qa.debian.or
Hi Nathan,
> I have successfully filed my 10 bugs (relevant files at [1]). I will
> commit the bug numbers to the list for 20130509 as soon as my request
> to join collab-qa on alioth is approved.
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~nhandler/.ec2/
Please remove all strings with error [2] from your
Dear QA people,
While triaging bugs that don't belong to any package I have found these:
$ querybts --buglist timeout
Querying Debian BTS for reports on timeout...
#531025 change in usage should be doc in NEWS. timeout command always take
'time' seconds to finish
#585745 Please drop timeout bi
Hi again,
I somehow have the impression, that the number of missing descriptions
is silently growing. It seems that the problem only concerns the English
long descriptions. To verify this thesis I did
udd=> SELECT release, language, count(*) from descriptions where
long_description = '' group
25 matches
Mail list logo
