Processed: tagging 647565

2013-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 647565 + patch Bug #647565 [qa.debian.org] madison.cgi: make it produce an easier to parse output Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 647565: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#562175: marked as done (qa.debian.org: QA Webpage: please link to specific information about MIA)

2013-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2013 05:49:37 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2975 has caused the Debian Bug report #562175, regarding qa.debian.org: QA Webpage: please link to specific information about MIA to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#705829: marked as done (qa.debian.org: changelog links on packages.qa.debian.org pages are broken)

2013-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 21 Apr 2013 09:43:19 +0800 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#705829: qa.debian.org: changelog links on packages.qa.debian.org pages are broken has caused the Debian Bug report #705829, regarding qa.debian.org: changelog links on packages.qa.debian.org pages are br

Re: Bug#705580: qa.debian.org: [UDD] import of long descriptions seems to be broken

2013-04-20 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, to provide more info about this: I noticed today that the descriptions were gone again. I mad a backup of the files mentioned below and also the logfile that is written and forced the import again. Any idea what might cause the problem is really welcome. Kind regards Andreas. On

Bug#705829: qa.debian.org: changelog links on packages.qa.debian.org pages are broken

2013-04-20 Thread Faheem Mitha
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important I clicked on the changelog for various packages listed in packages.qa.debian.org, and they all gave broken links. Eg. http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/current/changelog for apt (linked from http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/apt.html) g

[UDD] Package file lists / normalization

2013-04-20 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi, I was looking into importing package file lists into UDD today and got a proof of concept working. The following questions arose: 1) This data takes up quite a lot of space, i.e. 276 MiB for amd64 only. Is such an increase in space acceptable for UDD? If not, why not? 2) In order to save

Bug#705550: marked as done (PTS: provide more accessible package description)

2013-04-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:16:10 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2971 has caused the Debian Bug report #705550, regarding PTS: provide more accessible package description to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Re: PTS rewrite in Django

2013-04-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Pankaj Kumar Sharma wrote: > Further, how and where the bugs for PTS are reported ? And how I can > contribute to PTS in bug fixings ? Bugs are reported against the qa.debian.org pseudo-package. http://bugs.debian.org/qa.debian.org http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debia

Re: PTS rewrite in Django

2013-04-20 Thread Pankaj Kumar Sharma
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:20:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Pankaj Kumar Sharma wrote: >> > Till now I have gone through the codebase of PTS and have written a >> > small patch as suggested in [1] and

Re: MIA: cr...@30loops.net, please orphan haproxy

2013-04-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 20 avril 2013 12:48 CEST, Ricardo Mones  : >> Dear QA team, >> >> I would like to take over maintainance of haproxy in a team (I have >> already a comaintainer for this). It seems that Christo Buschek, the >> current maintainer is MIA. haproxy has been removed from testing due >> partly becaus

Re: MIA: cr...@30loops.net, please orphan haproxy

2013-04-20 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi Vincent, On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:34:39 +0200 Vincent Bernat wrote: > Dear QA team, > > I would like to take over maintainance of haproxy in a team (I have > already a comaintainer for this). It seems that Christo Buschek, the > current maintainer is MIA. haproxy has been removed from testi