Bug#704415: UDD: merge http://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/Hacking and http://udd.debian.org/hacking.html

2013-03-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd The content in hacking.html should be moved to the wiki. I was stupid to create that page outside the wiki in the first place. Links pointing to hacking.html should be updated (on http://udd.debian.org/b

Bug#704414: UDD: add importer for new DM procedure

2013-03-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, Please add an importer for the new DM procedure. See https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html and https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Bug#704413: UDD: Debian Maintainer Dashboard improvements

2013-03-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd I will use this bug as a meta-bug to track possible improvements to DMD. Here is my current list: [medium] switch to the same theme as Debian wiki [easy / web only] make CSS for table nicer (copy http:/

Bug#551655: marked as done (UDD: add pseudo-packages information)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 18:08:59 +0200 with message-id <20130331160857.ga10...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: Bug#551655: UDD: add pseudo-packages information has caused the Debian Bug report #551655, regarding UDD: add pseudo-packages information to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#611066: marked as done (UDD: please import Packages and Sources from archived releases)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 17:34:53 +0200 with message-id <20130331153453.ga6...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#611066: UDD: please import Packages and Sources from archived releases has caused the Debian Bug report #611066, regarding UDD: please import Packages and Sources fr

Bug#694669: marked as done (UDD: Missing data in the history.sources_count table)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:29:17 +0200 with message-id <20130331142917.ga3...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#694669: UDD: Missing data in the history.sources_count table has caused the Debian Bug report #694669, regarding UDD: Missing data in the history.sources_count table

Bug#704199: marked as done (UDD: add columns for Multi-Arch)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:12:28 +0200 with message-id <20130331141228.ga2...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#704199: UDD: add columns for Multi-Arch has caused the Debian Bug report #704199, regarding UDD: add columns for Multi-Arch to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#699268: marked as done (UDD: should learn about Extra-Source-Only: yes and ignore those packages in rmadison)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:56:29 +0200 with message-id <20130331135629.ga2...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#699268: UDD: should learn about Extra-Source-Only: yes and ignore those packages in rmadison has caused the Debian Bug report #699268, regarding UDD: should learn ab

Bug#599340: marked as done (UDD: ftp-master's lintian autorejects)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:45:54 +0200 with message-id <20130331134553.ga10...@ugent.be> and subject line Re: UDD: ftp-master's lintian autorejects has caused the Debian Bug report #599340, regarding UDD: ftp-master's lintian autorejects to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#637524: marked as done (qa.debian.org: UDD: Vcs-* header with uppercase letters not considered)

2013-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 31 Mar 2013 15:29:41 +0200 with message-id <20130331132941.ga1...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#637524: qa.debian.org: UDD: Vcs-* header with uppercase letters not considered has caused the Debian Bug report #637524, regarding qa.debian.org: UDD: Vcs-* header w

[PATCH] UDD: Fix debian version regexp when updating upstream

2013-03-31 Thread Simon Chopin
Hi, Version numbers such as 2.3.4-1~exp1 where incorrectly parsed as being entire upstream version. This patch fixes it. Cheers, Simon From 57036e390e528385b7a9c27b0b1247d4811f74bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Chopin Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:02:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Debian versi

Re: Is USTB info necessary?

2013-03-31 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 10:38:09 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Thanks for your reply, Lucas. > I think there a two use-cases for the Ubuntu tab (the same applies to > the Versions tab): > - informational use-case: "what's the version of this package in > Ubuntu? (would it be useful to provide a ba

Re: Is USTB info necessary?

2013-03-31 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, On 31/03/13 at 17:12 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Just a question in Maintainer Dashboard "Ubuntu" tag page, it has > "stable" information (USTB in source), What is a intention for it? > Usually I pick up the information for only Ubuntu -devel version, > so is there any useful in

Is USTB info necessary?

2013-03-31 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Just a question in Maintainer Dashboard "Ubuntu" tag page, it has "stable" information (USTB in source), What is a intention for it? Usually I pick up the information for only Ubuntu -devel version, so is there any useful info/usage with USTB? -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ d