Re: OpenMotif 2.3.4

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Greg Schenzel wrote: > FYI, I don't know if anyone has noticed yet but version 2.3.4 was > relicensed under the LGPL. Looks like we'll finally be able to get the > reference implementation into main and move packages that depend on it > out of contrib. It is much

Re: OpenMotif 2.3.4

2013-03-19 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:55:41PM -0600, Greg Schenzel wrote: > FYI, I don't know if anyone has noticed yet but version 2.3.4 was > relicensed under the LGPL. Looks like we'll finally be able to get the > reference implementation into main and move packages that depend on it > out of contrib. >

OpenMotif 2.3.4

2013-03-19 Thread Greg Schenzel
FYI, I don't know if anyone has noticed yet but version 2.3.4 was relicensed under the LGPL. Looks like we'll finally be able to get the reference implementation into main and move packages that depend on it out of contrib. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14:45PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > This can be approached and I could perfectly imagine to put the content > > of all tasks files into an UDD table if this might simplify things. But > > also here we should choose the table design apropriately: You can either > > give

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:47 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:33:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > jr, games blends > > For the moment I see some problem here because a single package could > perfectly be part of more than one Blend as well as part of more than > one task of

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-03-19 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Wise (2013-03-19 09:33:41) > For packages that are involved in a Debian Pure Blend, it would be good > if the PTS were to link to the blends site from the links on the right. Good idea! I suggest to do it for _all_ Debian Blends, not only pure¹ ones, similar to how QA pages also inc

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Paul, that's an interesting feature I have not thought about - thanks for bringing this up. On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:33:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > For packages that are involved in a Debian Pure Blend, it would be good > if the PTS were to link to the blends site from the links on the ri

Bug#702087: UDD: vcs importer broken since PET moved to alioth

2013-03-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, in the past I did some investigation into this and here is the status quo: In 2012-10, PET was migrated from a private machine to an Alioth machine. Since that migration, UDD (on ullmann.d.o) cannot access PET (on wagner.d.o) A solution consisting of adding the following entries into pg_hba.

Bug#690414: PTS: screenshots related improvements

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 10:20 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 17:06 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: > > > Indeed. Currently the software mainly uses debtags as heuristics to > > determine if a package would be an interesting target for having > > screenshots assigned. I'm open to ideas.

Bug#703402: PTS: link to the blends website for packages involved in blends

2013-03-19 Thread Paul Wise
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ble...@lists.debian.org For packages that are involved in a Debian Pure Blend, it would be good if the PTS were to link to the blends site from the links on the right. jr, games blen