Re: watch-wizard

2012-12-29 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 03:20:39PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > > > Do you mean "keep it" as in "keep doing thousands of pointless http/ftp > > hits on > > a regular basis just for a few hundred good uscan results" ? Or do you mean > > "keep it"

Re: watch-wizard

2012-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Bart Martens wrote: > Do you mean "keep it" as in "keep doing thousands of pointless http/ftp hits > on > a regular basis just for a few hundred good uscan results" ? Or do you mean > "keep it" as in "keep it for manual use to write watch files" ? When you put it

Re: Intend to change lintian.d.o/qa-list.txt

2012-12-29 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 09:09:19PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for > consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the > PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO > item/column. If

Re: watch-wizard

2012-12-29 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 11:26:18AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > What is watch-wizard? I mean /srv/qa.debian.org/mole/worker/watch-wizard. > I guess it is similar to the watch wizard part > of the old DEHS tool? It's probably the same watch-wizard. > > The ones that produce an error should probabl

Re: Intend to change lintian.d.o/qa-list.txt

2012-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: > As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for > consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the > PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO > item/column. If anyone is aware o

Re: watch-wizard

2012-12-29 Thread Paul Wise
What is watch-wizard? I guess it is similar to the watch wizard part of the old DEHS tool? The ones that produce an error should probably be ignored by the system. Manually verifying the 41+111+209 ones sounds like a good idea. I think that it has shown itself to be partially useful for existing

Re: Intend to change lintian.d.o/qa-list.txt

2012-12-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Niels Thykier writes: > As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for > consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the > PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO > item/column. The PTS and DDPO is the only user that I'm aware of

Intend to change lintian.d.o/qa-list.txt

2012-12-29 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, As far as I know, Lintian exports a file called "qa-list.txt" for consumption by the QA infrastructure. Particularly I suspect that the PTS and the DDPO consumes this file to display the relevant TODO item/column. If anyone is aware of any other consumers, do let me know about it (and let th

watch-wizard

2012-12-29 Thread Bart Martens
Hi, Summary of watch-wizard results : error = 3305 status Debian version newer than remote site = 41 status Newer version available = 111 status up to date = 209 It feels somewhat uncomfortable that watch-wizard is part of "qa". :-) Maybe we should verify the 41+111+209 generated watch files

Re: RC bugs missing from UDD (was: RC bugs missing after experimental upload)

2012-12-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 24/12/12 at 19:26 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 24/12/12 18:32, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >> And I also wonder if this may have happened with any other packages; > >> could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons? > > > >

Bug#695772: marked as done (bugs.cgi: allow filtering based on unblock/approve hints)

2012-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:10:13 +0100 with message-id <20121229111013.ga29...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#695772: bugs.cgi: allow filtering based on unblock/approve hints has caused the Debian Bug report #695772, regarding bugs.cgi: allow filtering based on unblock/appr

Bug#695543: marked as done (bugs.cgi: show unblock and removal requests based on usertags)

2012-12-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2012 12:08:28 +0100 with message-id <20121229110828.ga29...@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#695543: bugs.cgi: show unblock requests based on usertags has caused the Debian Bug report #695543, regarding bugs.cgi: show unblock and removal requests based on u

Bug#695543: bugs.cgi: also show removal requests

2012-12-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 14/12/12 at 17:50 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Control: retitle -1 bugs.cgi: show unblock and removal requests based on > usertags > > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:28:02AM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > > In bugs.cgi the unblock requests are shown based on bugs against > > release.debia

Bug#695508: udd: bugs.cgi - bugs filed against multiple packages is not associated with a source

2012-12-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 10/12/12 at 00:20 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:22:39PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > The bug #694368 is filed against libfuzzy2, libfuzzy-dev (src: > > ssdeep). At least in the view [1], this means that the "package" > > column gets the PTS link wron