Re: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/24/2012 07:26 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The package is no longer RC-buggy and /has/ been part of a stable > release, though this is only because of the action of NMUers. > I've added them to Cc: Mehdi, Bastian, do you have any personal >

Re: Bug#553898: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
I will do a proper orphan of a bunch of packages soon, as I am completely our of time. But in the meanwhile take this mail as an orphan bug report in wnpp. Thanks and sorry for the inconvenience. And merry Xmas. El 24/12/2012 19:30, "Steve Langasek" escribió: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sun, Dec 16, 20

Re: RC bugs missing from UDD (was: RC bugs missing after experimental upload)

2012-12-24 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 24/12/12 18:32, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> And I also wonder if this may have happened with any other packages; >> could RC bugs for Wheezy have gone missing for similar reasons? > > No, because they still show up in > http://bugs.debian.org/bugscan

Re: dogtail: Should this package be orphaned?

2012-12-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Andrew, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 09:37:02PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > > While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a package that > > should maybe be orphaned by its maintainer, because: > > * Out of date with upstream. > > * Buggy. (1 RC bug). > > * NPOASR. (Never pa