Re: quality assurance for games

2012-11-23 Thread Markus Koschany
On Fri, 23. Nov 21:44 Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:43:16PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Hello, > > > > one month ago i have started a similar thread on debian-devel-games but > > haven't got much feedback although at least one team member replied and > > supported my prop

Re: quality assurance for games

2012-11-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:43:16PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Hello, > > one month ago i have started a similar thread on debian-devel-games but > haven't got much feedback although at least one team member replied and > supported my proposal. [1] > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-g

quality assurance for games

2012-11-23 Thread Markus Koschany
Hello, one month ago i have started a similar thread on debian-devel-games but haven't got much feedback although at least one team member replied and supported my proposal. [1] My original idea was to track orphaned games, incorporate them into the games team and eventually remove them if nobody

Bug#694081: DDPO: maintainer's name is taken from revoked GPG uid

2012-11-23 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Marc, I added a workaround. http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@debian.org The solution is to learn carnivore about historical and actual data. That's not for today. :-) Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Bug#694081: DDPO: maintainer's name is taken from revoked GPG uid

2012-11-23 Thread duck
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Coin, Looking at: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@debian.org&comaint=yes or http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=d...@duckcorp.org&comaint=yes I see: Packages overview for The Duck Maintainer: The Duck Maintainer: The Duck

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

2012-11-23 Thread Arno Töll
On 11/23/2012 12:53 PM, Olivier Berger wrote: > You mean PTS, right ? I do, sorry for the confusion :) >> machine-readable information about the package. However, it misses the >> information from the versions column (i.e. the current version of a >> package told apart per suite). It would be sup

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data

2012-11-23 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Arno Töll writes: > The RDF pages for a package in the BTS contains lots of You mean PTS, right ? > machine-readable information about the package. However, it misses the > information from the versions column (i.e. the current version of a > package told apart per suite). It would be sup

[UDD] hints deferred -> lockfile found

2012-11-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, whoever knows what importer "hints deferred" might be - it does not seem to work currently but rathers sends a mail via cron job *every hour*. Kind regards Andreas. - Forwarded message from Cron Daemon - Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:11:04 + From: Cron Daemon To: lu...@deb

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:50:30AM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in > > testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. > > Sounds reasonable to wa

Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports

2012-11-23 Thread Bart Martens
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:54:16AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > When the backports version is outdated compared to the version in > testing, it would be useful that ddpo displays it in a different color. Sounds reasonable to want this. Any suggestions on the colors to use for up-to-date and outdat