Re: [PATCH] Update for Ubuntu Quantal as stable release

2012-11-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Right, but solving half of the problem could be easily done asking > alioth admins for properly setting ACLs for all DDs. You don't even need to involve the alioth admins, the web interface for project admins allows adding all members of the

Please set ACL for debian-qa repository [Was: [PATCH] Update for Ubuntu Quantal as stable release]

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Alioth admins, please set ACLs as described in [1] for all Git repositories of the collab-qa team to enable commit permissions to every DD. Kind regards and thanks for maintaining alioth Andreas. [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/FAQ#How_do_I_give_write_permission_outside_my_Alioth

Re: [PATCH] Update for Ubuntu Quantal as stable release

2012-11-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/11/12 at 10:01 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:47:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Regarding commit access for all DDs, that only solves half of the > > problem, since someone would still have to 'git pull' at some point. > > Right, but solving half of the probl

Re: Bug#692492: ITO: Orphaning audit package

2012-11-07 Thread Ricardo Mones
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:26:28AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > (Dropping the bug) > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2012, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Private mails should not be a justification for expedited orphaning of > > packages. With this bug report you have *now* used a proper channel for > > notifying

Re: [PATCH] Update for Ubuntu Quantal as stable release

2012-11-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:47:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Regarding commit access for all DDs, that only solves half of the > problem, since someone would still have to 'git pull' at some point. Right, but solving half of the problem could be easily done asking alioth admins for properly s

Re: Bug#692492: ITO: Orphaning audit package

2012-11-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
(Dropping the bug) On Tue, 06 Nov 2012, Steve Langasek wrote: > Private mails should not be a justification for expedited orphaning of > packages. With this bug report you have *now* used a proper channel for > notifying the maintainer that you want to salvage the package; so the clock > starts n