Bug#657216: marked as done (qa.debian.org: p.qa.d.o watch section not updating)

2012-07-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 09 Jul 2012 22:09:48 -0400 with message-id <1472614.dRUshZrzau@scott-latitude-e6320> and subject line Started working again has caused the Debian Bug report #657216, regarding qa.debian.org: p.qa.d.o watch section not updating to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#626254: PTS Code is pretty simple

2012-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, July 09, 2012 07:07:23 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: ... > What about http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/upstream-status.json.cgi ? > Note: it's JSON, not YAML. I could do YAML if that's a problem. > > It also includes paragraphs with status=error. You might want to > filter then out. DEHS repor

Re: [PATCH][qa.d.o/developer.php] Optionally show package description in its own column

2012-07-09 Thread Marcin Owsiany
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 10:46:04PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch makes it possible for one to show package > descriptions in a separate column in the packages overview. > It defaults to off for backwards compatibility. > > Please review and/or apply. I got no comments

Bug#626254: PTS Code is pretty simple

2012-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, July 09, 2012 07:07:23 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > What about http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/upstream-status.json.cgi ? > Note: it's JSON, not YAML. I could do YAML if that's a problem. > > It also includes paragraphs with status=error. You might want to > filter then out. It seems to wo

Re: [PATCH] Add ruby-debian to list of required Ruby packages.

2012-07-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 09/07/12 at 12:10 -0600, Tim Retout wrote: > --- > > Hi! Here's a trivial fix to the UDD hacking.html doc. Oops! Applied. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://list

[PATCH] Add ruby-debian to list of required Ruby packages.

2012-07-09 Thread Tim Retout
--- Hi! Here's a trivial fix to the UDD hacking.html doc. Kind regards, Tim web/hacking.html |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/web/hacking.html b/web/hacking.html index f72bbcf..b5d55f4 100755 --- a/web/hacking.html +++ b/web/hacking.html @@ -101,7 +101,7

Bug#626254: PTS Code is pretty simple

2012-07-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 09/07/12 at 12:28 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Here's the PTS code for collecting the version information from DEHS: > > # read info gathered from watch file scanner > data = yaml.load(file(os.path.join(dir, "dehs.yaml")), yaml.CLoader) > dehs = {} > for entry in data: > pkgname = entry[

Bug#626254: PTS Code is pretty simple

2012-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Here's the PTS code for collecting the version information from DEHS: # read info gathered from watch file scanner data = yaml.load(file(os.path.join(dir, "dehs.yaml")), yaml.CLoader) dehs = {} for entry in data: pkgname = entry["package"] if "status" in entry and "Newer version" in entry[

Bug#626254: Migrate PTS to UDD?

2012-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, July 09, 2012 04:22:06 PM Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 09/07/12 at 10:02 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >From looking at various DEHS errors, I agree that the DB is > > >missing/corrupt.> > > I would be willing to work on trying to figure this out if I could have > > access. > Hi, > >

Bug#626254: Who has access to the DB?

2012-07-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 09/07/12 at 10:02 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > >From looking at various DEHS errors, I agree that the DB is missing/corrupt. > > > I would be willing to work on trying to figure this out if I could have > access. Hi, Last week I tried to understand what was broken, but failed. So I wrote

Bug#626254: Who has access to the DB?

2012-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
>From looking at various DEHS errors, I agree that the DB is missing/corrupt. I would be willing to work on trying to figure this out if I could have access. Scott K signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#678356: marked as done (pts-static-n...@qa.debian.org seems to be broken)

2012-07-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:12:54 +0200 with message-id <20120709131254.ga26...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#678356: pts-static-n...@qa.debian.org seems to be broken has caused the Debian Bug report #678356, regarding pts-static-n...@qa.debian.org seems to be broken

Bug#678356: pts-static-n...@qa.debian.org seems to be broken

2012-07-09 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Raphael Hertzog said: > Hi, > > (Ccing debian-admin because we need their troubleshooting help) > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > In response to comments on #636010, I'm trying to add static news for > > linux-2.6, linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6

Bug#678356: pts-static-n...@qa.debian.org seems to be broken

2012-07-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, (Ccing debian-admin because we need their troubleshooting help) On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: > In response to comments on #636010, I'm trying to add static news for > linux-2.6, linux-kbuild-2.6 and linux-latest-2.6 about their being > renamed. It looks like the mail never arriv