Re: apertium at risk of removal

2012-06-05 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Le 05/06/2012 20:55, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit : Dear Debian Science Maintainers, Please consider taking over maintainership of the apertium package and its friends. Currently they are all at risk of removal because of maintainer inactivity, multiple NMU, low popcon, etc. As your package

apertium at risk of removal

2012-06-05 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Dear Debian Science Maintainers, Please consider taking over maintainership of the apertium package and its friends. Currently they are all at risk of removal because of maintainer inactivity, multiple NMU, low popcon, etc. As your package science-linguistics depends on apertium you have an intere

Please investigate orphaning/removing the diffmon package

2012-06-05 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hello, looking at dbs-using packages, diffmon looks like something that isn't really maintained: - last maintainer upload in 2002 - 5 NMUs in a row since then, first in 2006 I'd appreciate being kept in the loop, whatever the outcome is. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signatu

Re: checking buildd logs

2012-06-05 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Peter Palfrader [120604 20:27]: > > I presume it would mean exporting the qa role account to grieg, granting > > brlink > > access to it, getting someone to add appropriate SSH public keys to quantz, > > rsync over the database and do the HTML generation on quantz. Does that > > sound > > sane