Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Jonas Smedegaard dijo [Thu, May 31, 2012 at 05:52:47PM +0200]: > > > You avoided my question, it seems: What does "Maintainer:" mean, then? > > > > What does "Uploaders:" field mean? > > You still avoid my question: What does "Maintainer:" mean? This is getting silly. Please stop the word-defini

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Holger Levsen
On Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > You still avoid my question: What does "Maintainer:" mean? why do you ask rhetoric questions? It's defined in policy and you know it. So whats the point? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "uns

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-31 at 04:43pm, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 31 May 2012 16:15:31 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > [dropping PHP Pear team as cc] > > > > On 12-05-31 at 03:16pm, George Danchev wrote: > > > On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:47:21 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > > You and a lot of others fail to

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 May 2012 16:15:31 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [dropping PHP Pear team as cc] > > On 12-05-31 at 03:16pm, George Danchev wrote: > > On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:47:21 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > > You and a lot of others fail to realize that the *SPONSOR* is > > > > responsible for the

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[dropping PHP Pear team as cc] On 12-05-31 at 03:16pm, George Danchev wrote: > On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:47:21 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > You and a lot of others fail to realize that the *SPONSOR* is > > > responsible for the package. > > > > Huh?!? > > > > What does "Maintainer:" mean if no

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 31 May 2012 11:47:21 Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi, > > You and a lot of others fail to realize that the *SPONSOR* is > > responsible for the package. > > Huh?!? > > What does "Maintainer:" mean if not the entity being responsible for, > well, maintaining?!? Who is responsible for the

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Jonas Smedegaard (31/05/2012): > I have heard before the argument of the sponsor having responsibility, > but in reality I have *never* heard of sponsors actually being held > responsible for anything but the concrete upload of a specific > packaging release. Suggested reading: http://bugs.debi

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
On 12-05-31 at 09:22am, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 05/30/2012 11:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > It is better to have a well maintained package than to ait for > somebody who collected a number of NMUs and doesn't react to bug > reports for years. I perfectly agree. But it is better to have re

Re: Orphaning php-codesniffer, then take it over by the PHP PEAR team

2012-05-31 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/30/2012 11:11 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 12-05-30 at 11:30am, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> We aren't kicking him, we want to have the package team maintained. >> He's fine to come and join! > > You want to play by your rules (file), not his. That's kicking to me. > > >> This doesn't rea