Dear all,
In order to have a broader point of view on the debian/upstream file that we
are using, especially about potential clashes with other uses, and for making
sure that its syntax is broadly acceptable, I would like to finalise it as a
Debian enhancement proposal (DEP), probably this summer.
Hi,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:30:29PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I think the implemented-in::* debtags should suffice and already
> exist. I guess it is hard for people to remember to debtag their
> packages, hopefully the PTS links to the debtags site will help. If
> you want that to be determine
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
> What do you think?
This is already covered by debtags. It has implemented-in::* tags for this
purpose.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> What do you think?
I think the implemented-in::* debtags should suffice and already
exist. I guess it is hard for people to remember to debtag their
packages, hopefully the PTS links to the debtags site will help. If
you want that to be dete
Hi,
in WNPP bugs there is a field for "Programming Lang" but as far as I can
see this information is not propagated into the meta information of the
uploaded package. The only place where this information is recorded as
well is in the tasks files of Blends for prospective packages where we
simply
5 matches
Mail list logo
