Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 668814 qa.debian.org
Bug #668814 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: PTS page: link to patch tracker
returns: can't find any package named...
Bug reassigned from package 'www.debian.org' to 'qa.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found v
reassign 668814 qa.debian.org
thanks
Hi,
Le 14/04/2012 11:17, Jari Aalto a écrit :
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
>>From lower right of page in section PATCH-TACKER:
Please, have a look lower, in the footer: “Report problems to the
qa.debian.org pseudopackage in the Debian BTS.”
Hi,
On Samstag, 14. April 2012, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Related to this: package
> removal is a bit of a PITA to undo, unless I'm mistaken.
get the source from snapshots.d.o and reupload it - whats the big deal?
> 1) notify the last maintainer of a orphaned package when requesting its
>
* Arno Töll , 2012-04-14, 16:03:
Maybe we could establish some best practices for package removals like
filing a RC bug against the package assigned beforehand and reassign to
ftp.d.o a few days - say 10 or so - later.
[...]
Moreover, these bugs could be filed with a specific user tag to allow
* Stefano Zacchiroli , 2012-04-14, 15:41:
- Second problem: AFAICT from Jakub's mail, he has been notified of the
removal only *after* it has actually happened.
In fact, a "[wnpp] removal of aafigure has been requested!" mail was
sent to me via PTS[0] (sent by "WNPP Monitor "[1])
about 8 hour
Hi,
On 14.04.2012 15:41, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> 1) notify the last maintainer of a orphaned package when requesting its
>removal (that could happen automatically --- if someone provides the
>appropriate patch to the appropriate piece of infrastructure --- or
>simply documented as
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 02:35:05PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote:
> > > I hate learning that lesson.
> >
> > Likewise. Such removals make me want to quit Debian just a little bit
> > more and maintain packages just a little bit less.
>
> Yeah, I have to agree, sadly.
I love when we avoid getting
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 05:16:28PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend
> >> that I'm maintaining them instead.
> >
> > I ha
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend
>> that I'm maintaining them instead.
>
> I hate learning that lesson.
Likewise. Such removals make me want to quit
9 matches
Mail list logo
