On 04/13/2012 02:07 PM, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
>
> @ debbugs people: Is there any chance to include in the BTS also
> not-released ports? I mean, I know they technically are not Debian,
> but also non-free is not Debian and it is in the BTS ;) Are there
> reasons to avoid it, or is it technica
Le 13/04/2012 14:16, Clint Adams a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend
>> that I'm maintaining them instead.
>
> I hate learning that lesson.
Maybe requesting for adoption could fit better than o
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pretend
> that I'm maintaining them instead.
I hate learning that lesson.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
* Moritz Muehlenhoff , 2012-04-08, 17:51:
Please remove aafigure. It's orphaned since nearly two years and has
very low popcon.
Aha, yes, removing a perfectly good, bug-free package is indeed an
excellent way to improve "quality".
Thanks. This will teach me to never orphan packages, but pret
[cc-ing debian-debb...@lists.debian.org and debian-...@lists.debian.org]
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 07:33:09PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Francesca Ciceri dixit:
>
> >> where are we supposed to track bugs against packages in
> >> debian-ports.org’s unreleased suite?
> >
> >Aehm. No idea. I mea
Hi,
I am also interested in such feature for `packages overview' web page. As I can
see all necessary statistics is available in database [1][2][3].
Best regards,
Boris
[1] http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote
[2] http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_recent
[3] http://popcon.debian.org/unkno
6 matches
Mail list logo
