Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > > > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether > > > there is any chance to i

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 12749 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages > files from Squeeze (and Wheezy). Learn to read: In the last mails, cited many times, my sql query, the result.

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether > > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages > > files from Squeeze (and

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages > files from Squeeze (and Wheezy). > It seems extremely unlikely to get any change like that

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Andreas Tille
[Trying to reach SRM via this list. To get the history of this thread please see http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/02/msg9.html ] On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:44:49PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > >> You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are > >> all whe

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are >> all where the following query hits (in projectb): >> projectb=> select suite_name from suite where include_long_description is >> false; >> suite_name >> -- >> unstable >> propo

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Lucas, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:15:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 07/02/12 at 09:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > [Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa, > > Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him > > in this thread] > > Heh :) ;-) > > Hi St

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/02/12 at 09:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > [Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa, > Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him > in this thread] Heh :) > Hi Stuart, > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:26:11PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote: > > >1. Provide

Re: Description-less packages file

2012-02-07 Thread Andreas Tille
[Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa, Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him in this thread] Hi Stuart, On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:26:11PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote: > >1. Provide the missing information in the Packages.gz files