Hi.
I think Thorsten is hitting an other bug than that filed by Lucas. The
correct report is #550272:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550272
There is also a suggested solution, but actually no one ever implemented it.
About Lucas' bug: I can't reproduce it with any browser I tr
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:25:56 +0200
with message-id <4e52c964.9090...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #540414,
regarding PTS: version information only partially updated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 624227 626811
Bug#624227: packages.qa.debian.org: Links to obsolete and non-existent version
on mentors.debian.net
Bug#626811: PTS shows older versions on mentors.d.n in 'todo' box
Forcibly Merged 624227 626811.
> thanks
Stopping proc
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:03:52PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I'm having a look at bug #586931, that you filed long ago and that never
> had reply.
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586931
Could you please use meaningful subjects when replying to bugs? Not
everyone who
On 2011-08-22 23:03, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> Which content search function are you referring to? I don't know
> anything like that for PTS.
I mean the content search on
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Hi,
Tomorrow at 18:30 UTC on #debian-qa, I will organize a follow-up to my
Debconf BOF on archive testing, where interested people will be able to
set up their environment to do log analysis + bug filing.
The goal is to get every participant to file a few dozen FTBFS bugs, and
then discuss how to
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:07:08 +0200
with message-id <4e52c4fc.1010...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #552242,
regarding qa.debian.org: todo section: wrong l10n status report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Hi Andreas.
I'm having a look at bug #586931, that you filed long ago and that never
had reply.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586931
Which content search function are you referring to? I don't know
anything like that for PTS.
Giovanni.
--
Giovanni Mascellani
Pisa, Italy
We
Hi Giuseppe.
Is this bug still relevant? Did it happen again or can we consider the
faulty mirror fixed?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588644
Giovanni.
--
Giovanni Mascellani
Pisa, Italy
Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...
Has this 7-years-old discussion still some reason to be kept open? I
don't think so, but don't want to close it myself.
Gio.
--
Giovanni Mascellani
Pisa, Italy
Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org
signature.asc
Descripti
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:44 +0200
with message-id <4e52b878.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #532872,
regarding Please add a link to the patch-tracking service to the "Other links"
section of the PTS pages.
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:44 +0200
with message-id <4e52b878.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #532872,
regarding please provide links to the Debian Project patch tracking system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:44 +0200
with message-id <4e52b878.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #498313,
regarding PTS: Please link to patch-tracker.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:13:44 +0200
with message-id <4e52b878.7040...@debian.org>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #498313,
regarding [PTS] please link to patch-tracker.debian.org
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:25:21 +0200
with message-id <20110822142521.ga16...@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#638858: DDPO: Wrong number of Ubuntu bugs shown
has caused the Debian Bug report #638858,
regarding DDPO: Wrong number of Ubuntu bugs shown
to be marked as done.
Th
Am 22.08.2011 16:16, schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 22/08/11 at 15:58 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
>> Package: qa.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I browse my DDPO[1] the number of bugs in the Ubuntu package of
>> rawtherapee is shown incorrectly. It says that there is one bug but whe
On 22/08/11 at 15:58 +0200, Philip Rinn wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> when I browse my DDPO[1] the number of bugs in the Ubuntu package of
> rawtherapee is shown incorrectly. It says that there is one bug but when I
> follow the link[2] the bug list is empty (what
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
when I browse my DDPO[1] the number of bugs in the Ubuntu package of
rawtherapee is shown incorrectly. It says that there is one bug but when I
follow the link[2] the bug list is empty (what it should be according to the
ubuntu pages). It works for othe
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 08:41:14PM +0200, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
> the package dict-freedict-lat-deu hasn't been updated for years. I first
> contacted the maintainer around the time of the Lenny release, once again
> before
> the Squeeze release. In both cases I got no response.
19 matches
Mail list logo
