Re: RFH: handle bug reports for removed packages

2011-05-30 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Am 29.05.2011 12:54, schrieb Sandro Tosi: >> IIRC the FTP masters took over at least part of this. For eg: >> http://bugs.debian.org/596536 > Only for the new RM, not for the ancient removals (and sometimes I see > packages removed with bugs still opened, but didn't dive deep into the > issue

Re: RFH: handle bug reports for unknown packages

2011-05-30 Thread Sandro Tosi
Cool, go for it, it's all yours. On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:29, alice ferrazzi wrote: > I would like too help in QA and this looks like a nice work :) > > On 29 May 2011 12:33, "Martin Michlmayr" wrote: > > Over the years, with the help of Colin Watson and others, I've handled > bug reports for

Re: RFH: handle bug reports for unknown packages

2011-05-30 Thread alice ferrazzi
I would like too help in QA and this looks like a nice work :) On 29 May 2011 12:33, "Martin Michlmayr" wrote: Over the years, with the help of Colin Watson and others, I've handled bug reports for packages that the BTS doesn't know about (either because the package was removed, is in some unoff

Bug#628523: Don't be so sure about piuparts

2011-05-30 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sonntag, 29. Mai 2011, Thomas Hood wrote: > But piuparts gives many false positives I disagree with this. Out of 30k binary packages there are only 100-400 failures found out of which only a very few are false positives. > [...] please don't say "You > should fix it." Say, "You should invest