On 21/03/11 at 23:06 +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:09:14PM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just noticed that yaclc was removed, under the premise of being orphaned
> > and having a low popcon score.
> >
>
> yaclc is just a single perl file, maybe it could
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:09:14PM -0700, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that yaclc was removed, under the premise of being orphaned
> and having a low popcon score.
>
yaclc is just a single perl file, maybe it could be integrated into
devscripts?
Ana
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
On my developer page [1] some items have failed to update for the past
few days. For example, flamingo was uploaded to the new queue and
processed on 18th March [2] including marking the ITP [3] as pending
and adding to the NEW queue page [4].
Another c
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:13:49 +
with message-id <4d87b17d.7020...@periapt.co.uk>
and subject line better now
has caused the Debian Bug report #618869,
regarding qa.debian.org: DDPO out of date for several days
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 04:47:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Any suggestion on how to make more noise would be helpful. Do you have
Something along the lines of what we do for ITPs - post to -devel and so
on - would help. Right now it's an invisible process with no public
warning that thing
On 21/03/11 at 15:20 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:18:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > This removal is part of an effort to clean the archives from some of its
> > orphaned packages. Beginning of release cycles are a good time to do
> > this kind of cleanup, since th
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 09:18:34PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This removal is part of an effort to clean the archives from some of its
> orphaned packages. Beginning of release cycles are a good time to do
> this kind of cleanup, since there's a lot of time left to detect
> packages that have
Hi,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> (Look at http://udd.debian.org/bapase.cgi?t=o for the list I'm using -- or was
> using: I must admit that I got rather demotivated after Joey Hess' blog
> post[0])
>
> [0] http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/the_fate_of_the_orphans/
I don't think
Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:21:31 +
with message-id
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2499
has caused the Debian Bug report #618525,
regarding please add p.d.o and .dsc links for more suites
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
9 matches
Mail list logo
