Hi,
> (copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
> discussed, not d-qa)
As such I would suggest completely moving this thread over to d-devel
and dropping d-qa from subsequent mails.
[...]
> > If I don't see any solution emerging in a reasonable time frame, my next
> >
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
>> logrotate fixed.
>
> As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
> functionality or
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
> logrotate fixed.
As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
functionality or introduce new race conditions.
None of my emails to Florian ar
(copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
discussed, not d-qa)
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:23, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The short summary:
>
> 1. There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in stable's logrotate,
> verified to work for switching from the po
4 matches
Mail list logo
