On 22/05/10 at 15:07 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is good to care for packages from people who are currently too busy and
> making NMUs to fix critical/very important bugs. However, lately I have been
> seeing a lot of NMUs that are being very disruptive [0], you have a couple of
> exam
Quoting Ana Guerrero (a...@debian.org):
> I know this is done with the best intentions but if you think the package
> is in bad shape or neglected by the maintainer then it might better write
> to mia@, debian-qa@ or open a bug asking whether the package should be
> orphaned (or even removed).
Hi Ana,
I'm happy to start the discussion.
I sponsored the upload of a number of Jari's fixes. You state that they
were disruptive, but I'm wondering to whom. The uploads were to delayed
queues and the maintainer notified via the BTS, and in all cases where
the maintainer actually ACK'd the bug
Hi,
It is good to care for packages from people who are currently too busy and
making NMUs to fix critical/very important bugs. However, lately I have been
seeing a lot of NMUs that are being very disruptive [0], you have a couple of
examples below [1]. (This is not against Jari or Nobihuro, they
4 matches
Mail list logo