On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 17:29 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
> The website displays incorrect information, like
> a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
> a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in Stable.
>
> Nedless to say, t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 541081 + patch
Bug #541081 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org displays non-existing versions of dbus
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
tag 541081 + patch
thanks
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 05:29:32PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
> The website displays incorrect information, like
> a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
> a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please take a look at [1], specifically the dbus row.
The website displays incorrect information, like
a dbus_1.0.2-1+etch3 version in NEW for testing and unstable, or
a dbus_1.2.1-5+lenny1 for p-u-new in Stable.
Nedless to say, that there is no dbus_1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 511303 521048 540863
Bug#511303: ddpo: invalid link built for multiple package versions in NEW
Bug#521048: qa.debian.org: multiple version of packages in NEW handled
incorrectly
Bug#540863: ddpo: multiple versions in NEW break links
Fo
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (11/08/2009):
> Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
> there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
> standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.
If time permits, yes.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signatur
Hi,
* Andreas Tille [2009-08-11 15:28]:
> I had some discussion with Christoph Haas and he was wondering how
> his nice service from screenshots.debian.net might become available
> at packages.debian.org. I have no idea who maintains the code but
> perhaps somebody might enlighten me (or Christop
Hi all,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:48, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> The current maintainer of at, Ryan Murray ,
> is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
>
> Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
> packa
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
> there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
> standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone should adopt all alone.
It is worth noting
Hi!
Sandro Tosi schrieb:
> Package: at
> Binary: at
> Version: 3.1.10.2
> Priority: standard
> Section: admin
[..]
Anyone interested in co maintaining that? Upstream is non existent,
there are quite some bugs in the bts and the package is priority
standard. Doesn't sound like a package someone
Hi,
I had some discussion with Christoph Haas and he was wondering how
his nice service from screenshots.debian.net might become available
at packages.debian.org. I have no idea who maintains the code but
perhaps somebody might enlighten me (or Christoph) who can implement
a three lines patch whi
11 matches
Mail list logo
