Re: Package is (will be?) orphaned, and we wish to take over maintainership

2009-03-20 Thread Adeodato Simó
Hello, Thomas. Thanks for your interest in adopting yum. Your plan sounds good. Since the former co-maintainer explicitly suggested handing it over to some interested party, and the main maintainer recently retired from Debian, I think you can go forward immediately with this adoption. Also, pleas

Package is (will be?) orphaned, and we wish to take over maintainership

2009-03-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I hope that sending this as copy to debian-qa@lists.debian.org and debian-rele...@lists.debian.org is the way to go and that this is not disturbing some already busy lists. Forgive me if that is too much. It seems that the maintainer of the package has not been seen since 2005, and that the c

Re: piuparts PTS integration

2009-03-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Stefano, On Dienstag, 17. März 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Not a big deal. The PTS has always had maps between binary and source > packages. So if you prefer to produce result ordered per binary > packages that is fine too; we'll load them, associate them to binary > packages and link to

Bug#520496: Please change behavior of links to bugs

2009-03-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist thanks Package often has only one bug (especially RC-level). If package has only one bug than would you change the href of link? link could point to the bugreport instead list page. For example: http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=un...@debian.or

Bug#520490: Please add a link to the patch-tracking service to the "Other links" section of the PTS pages.

2009-03-20 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi, the Debian patch-tracking service is a very useful tool. I see no reason why it should only be found on packages pages and not on the PTS pages. Especially because patches mostly affect the source as a whole and not individual packages built from