Re: UDD schema for new queue

2009-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: -- Sources CREATE TABLE new_sources ( source text, version text, maintainer text, maintainer_name text, maintainer_email text, bin text, -- by parsing http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/_.html#ds

Re: UDD schema for new queue

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/02/09 at 14:48 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to include information about packages residing > in the new queue into Blends tasks pages. Because I decided > to use UDD as main source of information for these pages I > would like to inject information about new queue into

UDD schema for new queue

2009-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I would like to include information about packages residing in the new queue into Blends tasks pages. Because I decided to use UDD as main source of information for these pages I would like to inject information about new queue into UDD first. I've got a hint to http://ftp-master.debian

Processed: your mail

2009-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #trying to fix bts-link > # first, remove unnecessary merged-upstream previously set > forwarded 462470 https://bugs.launchpad.net/merge-o-matic/+bug/188955 Bug#462470: PTS: don't show changelog-only ubuntu patches Forwarded-to-address changed fro

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Are you interested in DEHS (whether a given package is up-to-date or not), or in the raw debian/watch content? I think two fields of information are needed: boolean is_up_to_date text upstream_version from packages table if you have

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/02/09 at 11:51 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> Well, January is over. ;-) >>> Any news regarding watch file information. >> >> erm, no, unfortunately. Want to work on it? :-) > > I prefer to work on things I have enough knowledge first - perhaps

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.822 Looks good. Any hint how to reasonably obtain description of binaries long_description of binaries homepage license(perhaps) The html page has links to http://ftp-master.debi

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Well, January is over. ;-) Any news regarding watch file information. erm, no, unfortunately. Want to work on it? :-) I prefer to work on things I have enough knowledge first - perhaps some people who harvested watch file information at other places

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:12:55 +0100]: > On 13/02/09 at 10:38 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Ahh, I forgot the third type of data: > >http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > I really would love to see this in UDD. What do you think? > > Should I contact ftpmaster about this?

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/02/09 at 10:38 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> ... >> So, yes, it might happen during january. > > Ahh, I forgot the third type of data: > >http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > I really would love to see this in UDD. What do you think? >

Re: UDD and DEHS (Was: Please provide a simple example)

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Adding Cc: debian-qa@ On 13/02/09 at 10:35 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> I wonder what might be your opinion about watch file information in UDD. >>> Do you see any chance that this might happen soon? >> >> I was very busy recently (I just defended

Re: Semantics of objects in UDD : seeking more standardization, interoperability ?

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 13/02/09 at 10:17 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Lucas Nussbaum [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:51:30 +0100]: > > > I've just made dumps of the DB available (see http://udd.debian.org/), > > so you could use that if you want to work on an offline copy. > > 403 oops, fixed :-) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu.

Re: Semantics of objects in UDD : seeking more standardization, interoperability ?

2009-02-13 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Lucas Nussbaum [Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:51:30 +0100]: > I've just made dumps of the DB available (see http://udd.debian.org/), > so you could use that if you want to work on an offline copy. 403 -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer

Re: Semantics of objects in UDD : seeking more standardization, interoperability ?

2009-02-13 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 12/02/09 at 18:00 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > (message about UDD, CC-ed to qa list, although I'm not so sure it > belongs here) > > I've just already responded (Message-Id: > <123445.7959.46.ca...@hortense>) to Enrico Zini on d...@l.d.o about > the lack of semantics (in the sens