Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
> Sadly no, mainly because I was waiting for a sort of approval/ack from
> QA team, that never came (I don't know if it's needed, but I saw it as
> a source of courtesy).
Well, maybe just because nobody in the QA team felt in charge of
providing you with a
Hi Christian,
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 18:59, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
>
>> I'd be very welcome to maintain it, in the QA architecture, but I need
>> some guidance in the setup on merkel and stuff like this.
>
> Any news about this ?
Sadly no, mainly becau
Quoting Sandro Tosi (mo...@debian.org):
> I'd be very welcome to maintain it, in the QA architecture, but I need
> some guidance in the setup on merkel and stuff like this.
Any news about this ?
bts-link is seriously missing, now, for those of us who heavily work
with their upstream's BTS (hint
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
DDPO has the ability to add "[DM]" to the package names when Debian Maintainer
is allowed to upload them. Since recent changes made by ftp-masters allowed the
flag to be set on the newest version of package (not necessarily in unstable,
but at least also in e
4 matches
Mail list logo
