Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The basic idea is quite simple, we want to ensure that each package is
> maintained as well as possible and for this we need to ensure that
> it has one or more active maintainer(s). Hence every X months, each
> maintainer rece
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 07:32:01PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It could also be used to create a new "maintenance" facet in debtags.
> maint::orphaned, maint::active, maint::passive, maint::help-needed,
> maint::need-active-maint
I've been thinking about such a maintenance facet for quite a w
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> The basic idea is quite simple, we want to ensure that each package is
> maintained as well as possible and for this we need to ensure that
> it has one or more active maintainer(s). Hence every X months, each
> maintainer receives a mail with a link to a web form where
* Raphael Hertzog:
> - what kind of maintainer he is
> - active (responding quickly, forwarding bugs, …)
> - passive (responds only to major problems)
> - backup (not doing anything unless solicited)
> - if the package needs an active maintainer or not (most perl modules are
> well maintai
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Luk Claes wrote:
> I don't think sending active maintainers questionaires is very helpful.
I don't think the active/not active criteria is so easy to find out. I can
be active on dpkg while being not active on my others packages. At some
point I must recognize that I've lost i
On 2008-12-20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Thanks for your constructive comments??? and the nice vocabulary.
Then I'm glad I didn't send my first draft with bad vocubulary.
Would a reply like:
"Thank you for your idea about improving quality of packages in debian,
but I don't think there is anyth
Responding to myself to share other details related to this idea
that I didn't want to include in the initial mail.
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> The basic idea is quite simple, we want to ensure that each package is
> maintained as well as possible and for this we need to ensure t
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2008-12-20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> maintainer receives a mail with a link to a web form where he'll have a
>>> list of all the packages that he maintains/co-maintains and for each
>>> package he has to answer several quest
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-12-20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > maintainer receives a mail with a link to a web form where he'll have a
> > list of all the packages that he maintains/co-maintains and for each
> > package he has to answer several questions that explain his rela
On 2008-12-20, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> maintainer receives a mail with a link to a web form where he'll have a
> list of all the packages that he maintains/co-maintains and for each
> package he has to answer several questions that explain his relationship
> with the package (the answer are prese
Hello,
I would like to propose something new that would partially supersede the
work done by the MIA team and that would also generate new information
somehow related to the topic of WNPP.
The basic idea is quite simple, we want to ensure that each package is
maintained as well as possible and fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
