On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:37:46AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> That is indeed a true statement, but I'm unsure what point you're trying
> to make in the context of this discussion.
>
> Care to elaborate?
Sure. The point I am trying to make is that encouraging someone to
adopt a package whe
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:44:12AM +, Clint Adams wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people
> > who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care
> > of it?
>
> T
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:21:19AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> So you think the Debian QA group, consisting of at most a dozen people
> who do QA uploads, maintaining over 500 packages, will take better care
> of it?
The commitment for maintaining a package should be greater than "will do
a
Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh really? so we should just say "sorry, no more foo for you" to the
> almost 22k users who have imlib on their system?
We should be trying to move applications to the current version of imlib
so that we can retire the no-longer-maintained older vers
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:50:10PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care about the package, please adopt it.
> > Thanks.
>
> I do care about the package but as a spare user, not as a maintainer; I
> won't put my name on a package I really
Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> DFSG:
* Social Contract
>> 4. Our priorities are our users and free software
>>
>> We will be guided by the needs of our users and the free software
>> community. We will place their interests first in our priorities.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
> [...]
>> * is orphaned (...); and because
> [...]
>> And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being
>> shipped in lenny? Is that right?
>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:36:43PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Of course the idea of having more updated data is appealing, I'd myself
> welcome
> RSS/atom feeds per-package (almost the same as PTS' upload news) or
> per-maintainer (either changed-by or upload key or whatever).
Note that I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 03:31:58PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is the database structure available somewhere? In a nice presentation format
> I mean :)
Not yet, as it is not in any way final :)
>
> The above question is because I don't understand very well why the name of
> the
Hi,
On Tuesday 22 July 2008 21:54, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
[...]
> * is orphaned (...); and because
[...]
> And because of those reasons we are preventing a package from being shipped
> in lenny? Is that right?
Yes. It's orphaned. If you really care
Christian von Essen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
Is the database structure available somewhere? In a nice presentation format
I mean :)
>
>
> Or, given a source package, if you want to know the maximum of the popcon
> scores of the packages build from that package, you just use the following
> query:
>
>
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 02:54:23PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Let me see if I got it right:
> You filed a bug against karchiver because it:
> * is not in etch (because it was not uploaded in time for etch),
> * is orphaned (...); and because
> * it has a "low" popco
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>> I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
>> (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
>>
>> I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least fr
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 05:06:26PM +0200, Christian von Essen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my name is Christian von Essen and I'm the GSOC student working on the
> Ultimate Debian Database project this year.
[...]
> Feel free to edit the pages if you see fit. I'd be glad to hear about what you
> are thinking
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:45:42PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch
> (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge).
>
> I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from
> testing) before lenny's rel
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:29:49AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:45:34AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > I've produced a script[0] to parse d-d-changes archives to a sane format so
> > to
> > produce an history of uploads made to debian[1] in this form:
>
> Ver
Hi,
my name is Christian von Essen and I'm the GSOC student working on the
Ultimate Debian Database project this year.
The idea behind this is to collect a part of the information about the Debian
project and import it into a database. The goal is to answer questions like
"What are the packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> severity 491803 wishlist
Bug#491803: [PTS] please point to UbuntuForDebianDevelopers where Ubuntu info
are shown
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:45:34AM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> I've produced a script[0] to parse d-d-changes archives to a sane format so to
> produce an history of uploads made to debian[1] in this form:
Very cool!
> comments/ideas welcome as usual,
I think the greatest part of your work
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34
> retitle 491803 [PTS] please point to UbuntuForDebianDevelopers where Ubuntu
> info are shown
Bug#491803: Good communication with upstream is good idea
Changed Bug title to `[PTS] pl
20 matches
Mail list logo
