Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:31:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:45, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from > > testing) before lenny's release. > [..] > > Comments, objections? > > Looks good to me (to remove a

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:23:56PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > >openmotif: popcon 782/90/347/32/313, looong orphaned, non-free, RC bug, > >rdepends: arb, motv, was part of oldstable > >-> keep in unstable, prod arb maintainer, remove motv > > I

Re: esound [was: Re: Non-related 'Recommends' dependencies - bug or not?]

2008-07-20 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Jason D. Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008, Martin Pitt wrote: >> > That's interesting indeed! So you avoid that by using an OSS driver >> > instead of the ALSA one

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:40:01PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Some of these packages were orphaned within the past month. I don't feel > such packages should be removed from testing; people may just not have > reacted to the orphaning yet. IME after the first few days it rarely makes any difference

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: openmotif: popcon 782/90/347/32/313, looong orphaned, non-free, RC bug, rdepends: arb, motv, was part of oldstable -> keep in unstable, prod arb maintainer, remove motv I'm the maintainer of arb. The former version of arb had serious trouble with

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Joey Hess
Some of these packages were orphaned within the past month. I don't feel such packages should be removed from testing; people may just not have reacted to the orphaning yet. Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > cryopid: popcon 233/23/203/7/0, RC bug, no rdepends > -> keep in unstable This seems potentiall

Bug#491574: DDPO: Lintian Column

2008-07-20 Thread Bradley Smith
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think it would be nice to have a lintian column (or 2?) on DDPO displaying how many warning/errors there are for each package. I know I personally would certainly find that useful. In fact it seems the rele

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:21:30PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 20 juillet 2008, vers 16:45, > Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > > libsvg: popcon 602/8/35/4/555, no rdepends (library) > > -> remove > There is no bug in it and it seems u

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Frank, On Sunday 20 July 2008 16:45, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from > testing) before lenny's release. [..] > Comments, objections? Looks good to me (to remove as suggested), thanks for the work! For those packages in testing,

Re: Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du dimanche 20 juillet 2008, vers 16:45, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait : > libsvg: popcon 602/8/35/4/555, no rdepends (library) > -> remove There is no bug in it and it seems up-to-date. -- panic ("No CPUs found. System halted.\n"); 2.4.3 l

Orphaned packages that were not part of etch

2008-07-20 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Hi. I've compiled a list of orphaned packages that were not part of etch (and, unless otherwise noted, were not part of sarge). I think it would be a good idea to remove some of them (at least from testing) before lenny's release. Including a package in a stable release gives it much more weight

Re: RFS: kino (NMU) fixes 2 goal for lenny bashism and piuparts warning

2008-07-20 Thread Francesco Namuri
Il giorno dom, 20/07/2008 alle 16.06 +0200, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto: > Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/07/2008): > > The upload would fix these bugs: 455021, 489619 > > > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > As former NM, I'd advise Cc-ing the RFS to the packa

Re: RFS: kino (NMU) fixes 2 goal for lenny bashism and piuparts warning

2008-07-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/07/2008): > The upload would fix these bugs: 455021, 489619 > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. As former NM, I'd advise Cc-ing the RFS to the package maintainers. Some will veto the NMU, and it's better if they do so in reply to th

RFS: kino (NMU) fixes 2 goal for lenny bashism and piuparts warning

2008-07-20 Thread Francesco Namuri
Hi, kino - Non-linear editor for Digital Video data The upload would fix these bugs: 455021, 489619 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kino - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib